Monday, August 14, 2017

THE CASH JOURNAL FOR 08-17-17

CASH IN THE APPLE FOR 08-17-17
By Cash Michaels

TRAGIC NATION - On occasion, I appear on the statewide public affairs program,
“NC Spin,” produced and hosted by Tom Campbell, a fine man. Among the guests Tom always 
has on “…to get the correct spin,” is conservative John Hood, formerly of the right-wing John 
Locke Foundation. He does write a column for the Carolina Journal online. John is smart, and 
isn’t out on the fringes like so many of his conservative brethren. He likes movies, and is a prolific author.
In short, John may be a conservative, but he does employ common sense more times than not.
So last weekend after the horrific events that took place in Charlottesville, I saw a Facebook post
that John authored that left an impression:
The populism, racism, and bigotry inherent in the “alt-right” movement and its more radical 
sympathizers do not reflect the principles of the modern conservative movement, and in fact are antithetical 
to those principles. Conservative leaders should explicitly and repeatedly condemn them. To the extent that 
the Republican Party represents the political aspirations of most modern conservatives in America, GOP 
politicians have a responsibility to do the same — to explicitly repudiate alt-right personalities, institutions, 
and ideas. They should make it clear that they do not want the votes of the David Dukes and Richard Spencers
of the world. In the aftermath of Charlottesville, most did some version of this, more or less effectively.
In his initial response, Donald Trump did not. This was, at the very least, gross incompetence or cowardice on 
the part of the president and his team. That's why they are attracting so much criticism across the board. 
When Bernie Sanders, of all people, does a better job of explicitly distancing himself from the violent acts of 
someone who purports to agree with him, there ought to be a lesson here for conservatives and Republicans 
who want their movements and policies to survive and thrive. 
I appreciated those words from John, but I noticed one thing that was glaringly missing, so I responded.
John, there is only one thing I can add to your otherwise excellent analysis, and you may choose to 
disagree, but this has been my experience and observation - conservatives and Republicans may not care for 
white supremacists and alt-right crowd, but they have conveniently turned the other way, or hidden behind these
 folks when it suited their purposes. Only when something like the Charleston Church massacre, or Charlottesville
happens, do conservatives and Republicans feel the coast is clear for them to condemn abhorrent racism that is quite apparent to the rest of us. The fact that it took the murders of nine black church members, including the pastor, to finally remove what had become a symbol of racial hatred from the SC capitol, tells you how convenient it was for Republican politicians to rest on their laurels about the issue, not wanting to proactively do anything until it became too politically untenable.When people like Trump publicly assaulted the American citizenship of the nation's first black president, people like Speaker Boehner stood by and allowed it to happen for political advantage, instead of standing up for American values and denouncing such hurtful nonsense. As an African-American, these incidents of convenient outrage further deaden me to what investment I have in this nation, or it's promise of "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." I don't see brave champions of American promise, but crass opportunists jockeying for power at all costs. Oh yes, this is where that old song about "well it happens on all sides" chimes in. Of course all, or even most Democrats or liberals are not sinless when it comes to the issue of race and justice. Even a cursory look at history tells us that. But given the primary behaviors of those currently in power when it comes to voting rights, redistricting, and overall social justice, the Republican Party has made it very clear that my citizenship and well-being take an extreme back seat to its aspirations of political dominance. So, in closing, John, the question must be asked....will it take another tragic day in America, where a young white woman gave her life for an America she deeply believed in, amid scenes of Americans at a most uncivil war, for conservatives and Republicans to once again gather the GUTS and COURAGE to act like Americans, and denounce pure NAZI hate and bigotry?        Because if we have to wait THAT long.........
Of course, several of John’s right-wing Facebook friends didn’t like my response, and said so.
And the beat goes on…..
-30-

CHARLOTTESVILLE CAN HAPPEN 
HERE, SAY RELIGIOUS LEADERS
By Cash Michaels
Contributing writer

The searing images of Neo-Nazis and white supremacists battling on the streets of Charlottesville, Va. 
with counter-protesters last Saturday, culminating in the tragic murder of a young white woman when a car
driven by an alleged Nazi sympathizer slammed into an unsuspecting crowd, are still in the minds and hearts
of most African-Americans almost a week later.
“The hate and violence we’ve witnessed in Virginia is reprehensible and has no place in our society,” said
Congresswoman Alma Adams (D-12-NC). “As a nation, we are better than this. It’s time we come together to stand up and boldly stamp out bigotry and hate.” 
Rep. Adams was joined in her expression of concern about the racist violence in Charlottesville by some of her North Carolina Republican colleagues, representatives Virginia Foxx, Richard Hudson, Patrick McHenry, and Sen. Thom Tillis.
The hate, bigotry and violence on display in Charlottesville is despicable and represents the complete opposite of what America stands for,” Sen Tillis tweeted Sunday.
But some black religious and social justice leaders, like Bishop William Barber, president of the NC NAACP, say statements of racist outrage from Republican leaders about Charlottesville ring hollow when the policies of these same NC GOP congresspeople against the interests of African-Americans are taken into account.
  To say you are against white supremacy without standing up against the policies that embolden white supremacist reeks of a terrible ignorance or deliberate hypocrisy,” Bishop Barber said in an interview.
“[Republican leaders] and others oppose the white supremacy in Charlottesville. OK, we all do. But here is the test - will they call for [White House presidential adviser Stephen] Bannon and alt-right policies to be removed from their agenda? Will they fully reinstate the Voting Rights Act to stop racist voter suppression and gerrymandering? Will they acknowledge the racist voters suppression in 2016 and join [the US Supreme Court] to condemn racist gerrymandering? Will they stop the racist attacks on immigrants? Will they challenge and stop [US Attorney General Jeff Sessions]  from ending affirmative action? Will they increase and call for support of federal investigation of unarmed blacks killed by police? Will they repent from how silent they were when Trump used birtherism [against Pres. Obama] to rally white supremacists for his campaign?”
Wilmington native Rev. Kojo Nantambu says the racial violence the world saw in Charlottesville on Saturday was something the country has been slowly moving towards ever since Dr. King’s death,
and could certainly happen here in North Carolina. White militia groups have been stocking up on weapons, preparing for a race war, especially after the election of the first black president, Barack Obama.
The only reason they hadn’t emerged until now, Rev. Nantambu contends, is because the Obama Justice Dept. had clamped down on them during his eight years in office. But now that Donald Trump is 
president, the white supremacist movement is beginning to rebound.
What Nantambu rails against most is the difference in how black demonstrators and white protesters are traditionally treated by police. As seen on Saturday in Charlottesville, where law enforcement did little to stop gun-wielding white neo-Nazis from parading their weapons in public (Virginia is an open carry state, but since most of those “Unite the Right” demonstrators were from out-of-state, if they brandished a gun, they were
breaking federal law for illegally transporting firearms across state lines). The neo-Nazis were able too push and shove police officers without incident, a stark difference from Ferguson, Mo. three years earlier where police confronted black demonstrators with tanks and high-powered weapons.
In Charlottesville Friday night, white supremacists even threatened a black church where ministers and counter-protesters were rallying in peace. Again, police did nothing to protect the churchgoers.
“So yes, this is going to get worse, even here in Wilmington,” Rev. Nantambu said.
Rev. Nelson Johnson of the Beloved Community Center of Greensboro, has indeed seen Neo-Nazi and KKK violence before, right here in North Carolina. 
On Nov. 3, 1979, five protesters in an anti-Klu Klux Klan march and rally were fatally shot by KKK and neo-Nazis. Rev. Johnson was the leader of that rally, and was arrested by police, who curiously were nowhere to be found once the shooting occurred. It was later determined that the white supremacists went to rally with the soul intention to kill, and yet, after two trials, none of them were ever convicted.
Now, 38 years later, Rev. Johnson looked back, knowing full well, that the “atmosphere” is ripe, for more 
racist violence like was seen in Charlottesville, and Greensboro.
“Everything that happened in Charlottesville is relevant, and North Carolina should be paying attention to all of it,” he said in a phone interview Sunday. Johnson went on to say that there are “political and economic forces that have been out of kilter” for many years, resulting in both whites and blacks to suffer accordingly. But while there are many whites who have struggled and are struggling economically - the very group that powered Donald Trump’s 2016 electoral victory -  there is little question that African-Americans have suffered more, and continue to do so.
Rev. Johnson believes that both groups are being manipulated to turn against each other by politicians and the wealthy, with poor whites being made to believe that African-Americans are to blame for their economic struggles.
“The fact that we are manipulated against each other is rooted in white supremacy itself,” Johnson maintains,  adding that the solution lies in “raising people’s moral and ethical understanding” about how they are being exploited by the institutional “undergirding economic forces.”
Rev. Johnson noted that beyond the documented fact that white supremacists went to both Charlottesville and Greensboro with violent intentions, another similarity was how public officials in Greensboro, and President. Trump after Charlottesville, all tried to equivocate that everyone involved was responsible for the fatal outcomes.
Veteran civil rights leader Rev. John Mendez, pastor of Emmanuel Baptist Church in Winston-Salem agrees with Bishop Barber that denouncing extremist racists is easy for Republican lawmakers, but taking stock of the cultural and institutional racism that laces their public policy when it comes to voter suppression, redistricting, LGBTQ rights or helping poor communities of color achieve equal opportunity, is something they’re not willing to acknowledge.
“A lot of people will jump on [what happened Saturday] because they think that’s what racism is…extremism, the Ku Klux Klan, white nationalists, Neo-Nazis, etc. But they reject or deny everyday racism that goes on in subtle ways in public policy.”
Rev. Mendez agrees that it is not a stretch to conceive of the  same events in Charlottesville happening here. The election of President. Donald Trump to office has exacerbated growing racial and political divisions that can only fuel even more confrontations if strong, moral leadership does not rise to the occasion.
“It’s a national atmosphere now,’ he said. “What happened Saturday was a strategic run, a test …to see if 
[white racist violence] could fly.”
Rev. Mendez added that unlike Ferguson, Missouri, where local police “attacked” protesters after the police
shooting of Michael Brown, police in Charlottesville were noticeably restrained against the neo-Nazis and other 
white supremacists.
Religious and social justice leaders say in light of Charlottesville, and what they say is Pres. Trump’s lack of moral leadership, there must be a coming together of people from all corners to help save this nation.
According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks white supremacist activity across the nation,
there are numerous Klan and neo-Nazi groups headquartered in North Carolina, particularly in the western part of the state.
On Monday evening in Durham, anti-racist demonstrators pulled down a confederate statue that previously stood in front of the old Durham County Courthouse, and took turns stomping it. Gov. Roy Cooper tweeted in response, saying, “the racism and deadly violence in Charlottesville is unacceptable but there is a better way to remove these monuments."
-30-
(UPDATED) DEMS BRACING FOR NEW SEPT. 1
GOP REDISTRICTING MAPS
By Cash Michaels
Contributing writer

According to reliable legislative sources, after the Special Session reconvenes Friday, preliminary redistricting maps may be completed then (or by Monday), with public hearings tentatively scheduled to take place either Tuesday, August 22nd or Wednesday, August 23rd in six to eight locations across the state. Depending on the location, various state lawmakers are expected to be present at those hearings.
Then on Thursday, August 24th and Friday, August 25th, there will be committee votes on the new maps. Floor
votes the following week (of August 28th) in both the state House and Senate are scheduled, with each voting to approve their respective redistricting maps, and then ratifying the other chamber’s version. That is the tentative schedule, with all relevant materials submitted to the three-judge federal court panel that ordered them submitted by Sept. 1st for judicial review.
Given the criteria adopted by the Republican-led Joint Redistricting Committee on August 10th, the 
new voting districts - to be drawn to remedy the 28 of 170 districts that were determined by the federal court 
to be illegal racial gerrymanders in the 2011 redistricting plan - will use the population figures from the 2010
US Census, employing the data from each legislative district to make them as equal numerically as possible, within
+ /or - five-percent deviation, as required by federal law.
The legislative districts will also comply with county boundaries as much as possible, maintaining county
groupings and not crossing county lines unless permitted by previous case law.
Using 2010 Census data and respecting county lines was all Republicans and Democrats could agree on
during the four-and a-half-hour session. The other seven voting map criteria were adopted amid fierce partisan debate, including criteria allowing for use of previous election data, split precincts and protection of sitting incumbents who were ironically elected from illegal districts in the first place. Democrats argued that ultimately, their views and concerns about the process weren’t being fairly considered at all.
What seems evident is that there may also be “double-bunking,” where some districts are redrawn in a manner forcing two current incumbents in separate districts to suddenly be redrawn into the same district, having to compete against each other for reelection. Democrats fear Republican leaders may use this redistricting tactic to punish the minority party.
Of particular concern was the Republican requirement that race not be used as a factor in redrawing the new
maps at all. This was a complete about-face from how the GOP “stacked -and-packed” black Democratic voters into
as few legislative districts as possible per the 2011 maps for the expressed purpose, according to the three-judge federal panel with concurrence from the US Supreme Court, to insure that they had as little influence as possible on surrounding legislative races between white Democrats and Republicans.
The court ruled that race was the predominate, illegal reason why those 28 districts were drawn. But now, Republicans were swinging the other way, saying that race, which legally can be a contributing factor in drawing maps, not the main factor, would not be used at all. For many current black elected lawmakers, all Democrat, that meant the percentage of black constituents in their respective districts could be reduced. There was also concern about the 1965 Voting Rights Act being violated, thus forcing the federal court to ultimately throw out the new maps, and further delaying the redistricting remedying process.
“We live in the South,” said state Sen. Paul Lowe Jr. (D-Forsyth). “When, in the South, has race not been a factor?”
“You’re still short-changing a group of people when you don’t consider us,” lamented veteran lawmaker Rep. H.M.“Mickey” Michaux, Jr. “The districts were declared unconstitutional because of race. If you don't use race to correct it, how are you going to show the court that they're not still unconstitutional?"
Rep. David Lewis (R-Harnett), chair of the House Select Committee on Redistricting who oversaw the 2011 redistricting maps, ignored Michaux’s reasoning, replying that he would not respond.
Legislative sources say leaders in the state’s African-American community should pay very close attention at how the new maps are drawn, given that race has now been totally divorced from the proceedings.
At the end of the long session, Democrats found little comfort in the outcome. They found even less comfort in knowing that the same Republican mapmaker responsible for drawing the 2011 voting districts found to be illegal because of  racial gerrymandering, Thomas Hofeller, has been rehired at $50,000 to redraw his original work.
So far, the GOP strategy has been to delay as long as possible to protect their veto proof majority,”wrote political analyst Thomas Mills in his online PoliticsNC column recently. “Maybe drawing maps under criteria that might not pass muster is part of that strategy. Either they get maps that will heavily favor Republicans again or they can draw out the suit over the next election cycle, keeping the current districts intact. Seems that’s a bad bet, but who knows?”
-30-

STATE NEWS BRIEFS FOR 08-17-17

NC KKK LEADER “GLAD” CHARLOTTESVILLE WOMAN DIED
[PELHAM] The Grand Dragon for the Loyal Knights of the Ku Klux Klan said in a voicemail to a 
local television station Monday that he was “glad” a 32-year-old Charlottesville woman was killed Saturday when 
a neo-Nazi rammed his car into a crowd of counter-protesters. Grand Dragon Justin Moore said,  “I'm sorta glad that them people got hit and I'm glad that girl died. They were a bunch of Communists out there protesting against somebody’s freedom of speech, so it doesn't bother me that they got hurt at all. I think we're going to see more stuff like this happening at white nationalist events.” Moore and his group were in Charlottesville last Saturday along with several other white supremacists. “We should have been able to go out there and have our protest and it should have been peaceful but it's the anti-fascist and the communists...continuing to try and stop us,” he continued. “So I think there will be more violence like this in the future to come.” Moore also later praised the alleged killer police have arrested for the murder in a recorded message at his headquarters.

GOV. COOPER WANTS CONFEDERATE STATUES REMOVED FROM STATE PROPERTY
[RALEIGH]  Gov. Roy Cooper has asked the NC Dept. of Cultural Resources to determine what the costs would be
to remove confederate statues from state property. In a public message, Cooper advocated removing the historic monuments, and also wants a 2013 law passed by the Republican-led legislature protecting them repealed, saying  that cities and counties across the state should have the authority to remove them if they wish.

PROTESTER ACCUSED OF CLIMBING LADDER TO PULL DOWN STATUE IS ARRESTED
[DURHAM] Takiyah Thompson, a member of the Workers World Party, was arrested Tuesday a day after she
and an estimated 100 demonstrators pulled a confederate statue in front of the old Durham County Courthouse. Thompson allegedly climbed the ladder to put the rope around the statue to allow others to pull it down. Durham County Sheriff Mike Andrews vows that everyone involved in destroying the statue were on videotape, and would be apprehended. “No one is getting away with what happened,” he said.

-30- 











 




Tuesday, August 8, 2017

THE CASH JOURNAL FOR 08-11-17

CASH IN THE APPLE FOR 08-10-17
by Cash Michaels

DEMOCRATS LOOK TO 2018 - Believe it or not, we’re already in the throes of Election 2018,
even though many of us are still recovering from the election debacle of 2016. It’s funny how the guy who
is responsible for everyone’s collective headache is on a 17-day vacation at one of his swank golf resorts 
after just over six months on the job (with little to show for it besides a whole lot of grief), and yet it’s quite
clear that the rest of us are the ones who really need the time off.
So it’s in this atmosphere that the Democratic Party prepares for the 2018 mid-term elections next 
year.
By all accounts, given the disastrous track record thus far of Republican leaders in Congress (which 
has a lowly eleven percent approval rating ) and their president (whose poll numbers are in the low 30’s and 
steadily dropping), 2018 should be a drop in the bucket for Democrats, given the tremendous turmoil we see 
in Washington, DC on a daily basis with investigation on top of investigation of the Trump 
Administration (if you want to call it that) and the Trump campaign’s alleged collusion with the Russian
government to win the 2016 presidential election. 
Winning in 2018 should be a lead pipe cinch for Democrats….but it’s not. Apparently folks aren’t
feeling Democrats that much because, many analysts say, no one can us what Democrats are for.
Don’t get me wrong…there’s no question that Dems are against Trump. Heck, there are even some
Republicans at long last, who are also, finally, against that racist loudmouth from New York. But the GOP has
It’s base of supporters so psyched out, all they had to say they’re against Hillary and Obama, and for lower 
taxes, and voila, they make. horse race out of any and every race.
Dems don’t have it so good. Regardless how bad Trump and the GOP are doing, Democrats have the
hardest time convincing white working class and African-Americans that they can do any better. And that’s
because Republicans have done such a bang-up job convincing white working class folks that black people 
have more rights than they do, and if Democrats get back in control, it will only get worse.
Yes, it basically boils down to unsubstantiated race envy, primarily because the economy hasn’t 
worked out too well for the average Joe and Mary six-pack. The super-rich, hey, even the not-so-super rich, 
are doing quite fine, thank you. But the average lower middle-class white person is struggling, and resents it,
and is consistently told by the Republican Party that it’s the Democrats’ fault, and if they get back into power,
they’ll just pick up where Barack Obama left off.
Meanwhile, on the flip side, African-Americans apparently didn’t show up in Obama-style numbers in 
the 2016 elections, and many are now concerned that unless Democrats can show some definite outreach to
the most loyal base in the Democratic Party, more and more black voters just may re-register as independents,
assuming they decide to vote at all.
So Dems in 2018 have to figure out how to win back the white working class voters Trump won with, 
but also convince African-Americans that their wishlist for better jobs, affordable housing, improved education,
affordable health care, fairer law enforcement….and the list goes on, will also receive full respect and better focus.
Thus far, I’m not seeing very many signs that Democrats are prepared to do that.
Add the wild-card Bernie Sanders faction factor, which further splits the Democratic Party, and you have 
yourself a mess.
So Dems, unless you can pull it together (and stop blaming Nancy Pelosi for everything), you will be 
kissing 2018 goodbye. And 2020 too, while we’re at it. Because believe it or not, Republicans can survive this
Trump fiasco if they play their cards right. All they have to do is keep Democrats off balance like they always do.
Dems have to finally realize that they are in a real war for the soul and future of this nation, and the world. 
You can be both decent and tough to win. For some reason, Democrats don’t believe that.
Better start, before it’s too late.
-30-

GOP HEAD BLASTED FOR SAYING
“DEMS MURDERED BLACKS” IN 1898
By Cash Michaels
Contributing writer

If NC Republican Party Executive Director Dallas Woodhouse set out to deliberately stirrup a hornet’s nest
of controversy and criticism with his latest racial remarks, he’s succeeded. With no less than the chairman of the 
NC Democratic Party calling Woodhouse “unhinged,” Democrats and activists literally lined up Monday to blast 
the unabashedly partisan Woodhouse for stating in a series of tweets Sunday that Democrats “murdered blacks” in the port city of Wilmington during the Nov. 10, 1898 Wilmington Race Massacre, when white supremacists
attacked and kill black people, sowing the seeds of the racist Jim Crow era that would last at least a century after.
Woodhouse reliably trolls the Democratic Party every chance he gets, but this time, critics say, he’s gone too far.
It all started when the NC Democratic Party sent out a tweet Sunday acknowledging August 6th as the 52nd anniversary of 
the 1965 Voting Rights Act, the landmark federal legislation that outlawed racial discrimination in voting.
“On this anniversary of the Voting Rights Act, let’s celebrate how far we’ve come but remember that we must
fight to keep moving forward,” stated the NCDP tweet. Accompanying the message was a picture of former President Barack Obama with his family, marching across the Edmund Pettus Bridge two years ago to mark the 50th anniversary of the historic civil rights march from Selma to Montgomery, Ala.
The NCDP tweet included the famous quote from former civil rights activist John Lewis, now a US congressman from Georgia. “If you see something that is not right, not fair, not just, you have a moral obligation to do something about it.”
Then, Woodhouse, for whatever reason, decided to respond to the NCDP tweet with, “From the party that
ran a racist campaign of murder and closed the polls to blacks who were Republicans, gaining power for 100 years.”
In subsequent tweets, the NCGOP executive director continued, “After they murdered blacks in
Wilmington [the NC Democratic Party] passed what they call the White Declaration of Independence. The 
Wilmington Riot of 1898 was not an act of spontaneous violence. The events of Nov. 10, 1898 were a result of the
long-range campaign strategy by Democratic Party leaders to regain political control of Wilmington - at that time
[the] state’s most populous city - and North Carolina in the name of white supremacy.”
For the most part, the facts that Woodhouse stated are not wrong, though he admitted in a subsequent 
interview that he actually got them from Wikipedia. But Democrats, and others, blasted Woodhouse for essential information he apparently left out to leave the impression that the Democratic Party is still ruled by white supremacists, and that Republicans are a much better political fit for African-Americans today.
Indeed, until the 1960s, blacks were primarily members of the Republican Party because historically, it was
the party of President Abraham Lincoln, known for freeing the slaves. Blacks shifted to Democrats with the election of President John F. Kennedy.
Woodhouse's statement failed to mention that the North Carolina General Assembly and the N. C. Democratic Party did issue formal apologies (in 2007) for the massacre and the resulting official oppression which was imposed upon African Americans in this state from 1898 until 1970,” says NC NAACP Legal Redress Committee Chairman Irving Joyner, who also served as a co-chairman of the 1898 Wilmington Race Riots Commission, which researched the incident, and issued a report in 2007. 
      “Those apologies did not rectify nor compensate for the many deaths and destruction which African Americans experienced, but they did acknowledge that a terrible wrong did occur to our people and to every North Carolina citizen,” Joyner added.
Woodhouse apparently also forgot that it was a Republican - then state House Rep. Thom Tillis  (now a US senator) - who actively opposed the official apology from the Democrat-led NC General Assembly, telling his constituents in a letter, “It’s time to move on.”
Rep. Deb Butler, a District 18 Democrat representing Brunswick/New Hanover counties, was blunt about the thinly veiled NCGOP rhetorical attempt.
“The suggestion that the North Carolina Democratic Party is harmful to African Americans is perfectly ludicrous,” she said. “One need look no further than the current composition of the North Carolina House of Representatives to see that not ONE person of color serves from the NCGOP.”
Rep. Butler continued,  “Democrats in NC today embrace diversity in every way. That side of the aisle mirrors Trump's cabinet and it is entirely homogeneous. That's their loss and shame on [Woodhouse] for his laughable assertion otherwise.”
After saying in a statement that, “This is unhinged even for the NC GOP, a party that is desperate to hide three words: illegal racial gerrymander,” NC Democratic Party Chairman Wayne Goodman continued, “Republicans …are targeting African-American voters with ‘surgical precision’ [with voter suppression], and would rather attack Democrats than work to protect voting rights for the black
community.”
State Sen. Paul Lowe (D-Forsyth) agreed.
“Since the 1960’s the Democratic Party has been more sensitive to the issues and concerns of people of color, women and the poor. At this time, the Republican Party doesn’t seem to be offering a moderate or progressive agenda that will serve all the people of this state.”
However, Rep. Ed Hanes, Jr. (D-District 72), feels that neither Republicans or Democrats have been completely just in their treatment of African-Americans. “It's difficult to howl about  the ills of the Republican party, however, when racism and social division persists within the Democratic Party.  Is it better?  Yes, without doubt,” Hanes said, but later adding,”We're a party divided very similarly to how our nation is divided.”  
  “The Republicans know and exploit it!,” Rep. Hanes concluded.
  And NCNAACP Legal Redress Chair Irv Joyner summed up reaction to Woodhouse’s controversial tweet with, “While I am cognizant that Woodhouse is aware of the past sordid history of the Democratic Party, I bemoan his failure to recognize and acknowledge the racial harm that the present day Republican leadership is attempting to inflict upon African Americans and racial minorities today.”
For his part, NC GOP Executive Director Woodhouse told a local Raleigh television station Monday that he was  “tired of being lectured to by people with a murderous, violent history."
Several Republican lawmakers were contacted for comment for this story. Only one responded, Rep. Donny Lambeth, and that was only to say that he was away on vacation with his family this week.
-30-


                             STATE SEN. BEN CLARK, WITH SENATE MINORITY LEADER DAN BLUE

GOP WARNED TO BE FAIR 
IN REDISTRICTING
by Cash Michaels
contributing writer

What kind of legislative voting district maps will the Republican leadership of the NC 
General Assembly come up with by Sept. 1st, and what’s behind a new House bill designed to 
redistrict state judges? Those are two of the pressing questions hovering over state lawmakers
as many gathered for the third Joint Select Committee on Redistricting today to further consider 
criteria for new voting maps ordered by a three-judge US District Court panel two weeks ago.
Democrats, and members of the general public, during a legislative hearing last week, 
made it clear that they want an above-board process, free of racial (as ordered by the US 
Supreme Court and partisan gerrymandering. Today’s committee meeting was scheduled to focus 
adopting the criteria to determine what the revamped maps should look like once redrawn.
Democrats are concerned about the process because GOP legislative leaders have rehired 
Thomas Hofeller, who drew the 2011 maps that the US High Court recently ruled were illegal because 
28 North Carolina districts were racially gerrymandered.
“That doesn’t do much to restore people’s trust in the process,” said Senate Minority Leader Dan Blue.
At an August 2nd press conference, Sen. Ben Clark (D- Cumberland), offered criteria that he 
and Senate Democratic leadership felt should definitely be considered in the mix, including partisan 
advantage in redrawing the districts; no splitting of voting districts (except when necessary to comply
with zero deviation population requirements; and ensuring the none of the nine Senate districts and 
19 House districts deemed as unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court shall have a total black voting 
age population higher than that which existed in those enacted NC legislative districts that were in 
effect in 2010.
In other words, Republican mapmakers can’t “stack-and-pack” more black voters into districts
than there were prior to 2011 redistricting plan.
In response to the three-judge panel’s directive, Republican legislative leaders vowed to have 
one day of statewide public hearings on the new maps once they’re drawn, though they haven’t said when.
They’ve circled Aug. 24th as the date the legislature will vote on the maps.
Sept. 1st is the court-imposed deadline for the legislature to submit the new maps, along with any
supporting documentation, competing maps, and public testimony to the three-judge panel for review. 
Lawmakers are given the liberty of extending that deadline to Sept. 15th if they need more time.
Ultimate the federal court wants the new maps in hand, reviewed and approved long before 
November, which is when Republican legislative leaders originally hoped to stretch the deadline out to.
Meanwhile the NC NAACP rallied across from the Legislative Building Tuesday, “…to demand 
an illegal N.C. General Assembly to cease any new legislative action until new legislative elections
are held on the basis of an electoral map that complies with the Constitution.
“The current leadership of the General Assembly was unconstitutionally empowered for the 
last three election cycles based on its own maneuvering to pass anti-Black, anti-Immigration- anti-gay, 
anti- healthcare anti-poor-people, anti- women, anti- workers, anti-democracy discriminatory
redistricting maps,” said NCNAACP Pres. Bishop William Barber in a statement. “It gained that power 
through a perversion of the Voting Rights Act and then abused its ill-gotten power at every turn. 
With the special legislative session reconvening on Friday, August 18th, there are rising concerns
about House Bill 717 titled, “ Revise Judicial Districts.” 
“I am extremely concerned about HB717 judicial maps that force district court judges of the same political
[party] to compete in a primary,” stated Rep. Evelyn Terry (D-Forsyth). That equates to worse. It’s called double-
bunking.”
Thus far, HB717 has not been debated on the House floor.

-30- 


STATE NEWS BRIEFS FOR 8-10-17

STATE LAWMAKERS ASKED TO ALLOCATE $2.6 MILLION TO
MONITOR GEN X IN CAPE FEAR
[WILMINGTON] The NC Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ)
and the NC Dept. of Health and Human Services (DHHS) are asking legislative
leaders for $2.6 million to monitor the level of Gen X chemical contamination
in the Cape Fear River for the next year, and determine what health impacts it
may have on those who drink the water. The Cape Fear is a primary source of 
drinking water for Wilmington and surrounding areas. The Gen X chemical was 
found in the Cape Fear in June after it had been routinely discharged from a manufacturing 
plant. Gov. Cooper ordered that that plant no longer is granted a permit for
further discharges. DEQ says it needs more resources to deploy adequate staff to 
monitor water quality. DHHS will hire experts in determining if there are any health
issues associated with ingesting Gen X, and how to counter them.

GOV. COOPER EXPANDS LAWSUIT, SAYS PARTS OF NEW BUDGET UNCONSTITUTIONAL
[RALEIGH] Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper has no intention of allowing the Republican-led
NC legislature to take anymore of his constitutional powers away from him, which is why he expanded a 
current lawsuit he’s previously filed to stop them. Cooper is contending that several portions of the new state 
budget he’s vetoed are unconstitutional, even though state lawmakers overrode the governor’s veto in June. In 
his suit, the governor objects to the legislature ordering his budget director to increase funding to a particular
program; assuming authority over federal block grant spending; and assuming authority over settlement money
coming to the state which the governor normally oversees. Senate President Pro tem Phil Berger responded to 
Cooper’s new filings, saying,”We expect the judiciary will see through his thinly-veiled power grab, follow 
the constitution and dismiss this frivolous lawsuit." 

WAKE COUNTY FINALLY APPROVES EARLY SUNDAY ALCOHOL SALES
[RALEIGH] Wake County has now joined several other areas of the state where alcohol can be sold at
10 a.m. on Sunday mornings, instead of 12 noon as it had been previously. By a 6-1 vote, the county joined Durham, 
Chapel Hill and other municipalities across the state, thanks to a new state law passed by the legislature in June.
Local governments had to permission before beginning. This is the second vote Wake County had to take in order 
to authorize liquor sales.

-30-









Monday, July 31, 2017

THE CASH JOURNAL FOR 08-04-17

CASH IN THE APPLE
By Cash Michaels

HOW FAR WE’VE FALLEN - A few weeks ago we wrote about the controversy stirred up when Bishop William Barber ( yes, he’s been promoted), president of the NCNAACP, criticized the right wing evangelicals who recently went to the White House, and laid hands on Pres. Trump, effectively praying for him to continue doing what he’s doing.
Barber pretty much said that given the evil Trump has been directly responsible for since taking office (not to mention the evil he was knee deep in before he even ran for office), any minister of GOD worth his/her salt should be praying that Almighty GOD correct Trump’s crooked, corrupted heart, NOT bless them. Given that during the election, Trump won the lion’s share of the evangelical vote, followed now by equally strong support from evangelical Christians now that he’s president, the question must be asked, “Why?”
Keep in mind that these folks have every right to support anyone they choose politically. But also note that we’ve seen the true colors of some of these right-wing preachers before - namely when Pres. Barack Obama was in office.
And it wasn’t pretty.
Let’s start with one of the biggest - Rev. Franklin Graham.
The son of the powerful, legendary evangelist Billy Graham (who admittedly kept his mouth shut during the civil rights movement), Franklin Graham is as right-wing as you get. Again, that’s his right. But that also tells us how he sees GOD - through his own warped sense of conservative “decency.”
Thus, on the exploding issue of transgender American citizens serving in the US armed forces, something that Trump unceremoniously announced he would order it stopped, Rev. Graham said, “He’s exactly right. And I’m proud that we have a president who sees and understands the truth."
That was a direct slap at former President Obama, who did order that all Americans, regardless of their sexual identification, be allowed to serve their country, as long as their personal preferences don’t disrupt the operation of the military.
Seems sensible enough. But Franklin Graham had it in for Obama from the very beginning. Like when he said that Obama “may be secretly a Muslim” and only started attending Christian church to bolster his political career. Or when he bashed the president for issuing a decree that transgender students be allowed to use the bathroom of their choice in public schools without discrimination. Graham didn’t like that at all.
And please don’t forget when Graham told a conservative TV host, “…the policies that [Obama] has stood behind as president have been against Christ and against His teachings.”
But at least Rev. Graham never called for the “death” of Pres. Obama publicly (at least I can’t find any evidence of it). But other right-wing pastors have.
Baptist Minister Wiley Drake (former second Vice President of the Southern Baptist Convention) said on June 2, 2009 that “…unless Obama repents, he is praying for God to kill him…” because of the president’s stand on abortion. 
Then in August 2009, Pastor Steven Anderson raised eyebrows when delivered a sermon titled, “Why I Hate Barack Obama” and asked his congregation to join him in praying for the president’s death. “I hope that God strikes Barack Obama with brain cancer so he can die like Ted Kennedy, and I hope it happens today," Pastor Anderson told a local Fox-TV affiliate in Phoenix, Arizona.
For the record, Anderson’s church drew a large number of protesters who didn’t appreciate his ungodly request.
A few years ago, Daily Beast writer John Avlon authored a piece titled, “Praying for Obama’s Death,” where he wrote, in part, “…Praying for President Obama’s death has become a sick cottage industry for some evangelicals on the lunatic fringe. Bumper stickers, T-shirts, and teddy bears are sold with the wholesome-sounding slogan “Pray for Obama” but tagged with the more troublesome “Psalm 109:8”—which reads “May his days be few; may another take his place of leadership” followed by “May his children be fatherless and his wife a widow.”
“If you have an evil leader above you, you pray that Satan will stand by his side and you ask God to make his children fatherless,” the article continued.
Now last I learned, Barack Obama was a principled man and faithful  husband, with a loving wife, two daughters, a dog named “Bo,” and a frequent churchgoer. Yes, as president, he believed in freedom of choice, same-sex marriage between two consenting adults.
And for this, some right-wing preachers literally prayed for Obama’s death.
Meanwhile Donald Trump is a racist playboy who married three times, was accused of raping one of his wives, has been accused of sexually harassing multiple women, was cited by the federal government for denying apartments to African-Americans, lied about Barack Obama not being born in America, and has been a proven liar about just about everything else in his orbit.
And yet, because Trump is seen as rich and powerful, right-wing evangelicals will forgive him any sin, any crime, because they believe as long as he’s in office, they can get whatever laws they want passed.
They’re willing to put up with his crooked foolishness for their own unjustified ends.
No wonder they’re praying for his success. Trump’s success, is their success.
But not necessarily America’s, and there’s plenty of proof on the table to cinch that.
So, just because a preacher says he ‘knows” GOD, doesn’t mean anything if they can’t utter a word about tending to the poor, the sick and the weak. If the only “sins” these clowns can muster lather over are abortion and one’s sexual orientation, and not the pure evil we see every day coming out of the White House, then that tells you everything you need to know about right-wing “fake” ministers.
Pray for them, for they know not what they do!

-30-

NCNAACP’S BARBER SAYS MAP 
RULING “A MAJOR VICTORY”
By Cash Michaels
Contributing writer

The outgoing president of the NC NAACP calls the Republican-led legislature being forced to redraw its unconstitutional legislative voting maps by Sept. 1st “a major victory.”
“Forcing the legislature to redraw lines with mandatory court overview is a major victory,” Bishop ayWilliam Barber, said in a statement after a three-judge US District court panel ruled Monday that the NC General Assembly had to redraw 28 of 170 legislative districts from the 2011 redistricting map  because of racial gerrymandering.
“[This is] more reason why the General Assembly should not pass anymore legislation because they are an unconstitutionally constituted racially created legislature that fundamentally violates our democratic principles.”
Indeed, the plaintiffs in Covington v. North Carolina were  certainly hoping that judges James Wynn and Catherine Eagles  (both Obama appointees), and Thomas Schroeder (a George W. Bush appointee) –  which heard arguments last week in Greensboro, would rule not only that the districts must be redrawn immediately, especially since state lawmakers are back in special session starting today, but that special elections would be held on March 6th, 2018.
The judicial panel, however, decided against ordering a special election, saying that it was too late for it to be conducted prior to the regularly scheduled 2018 mid-term election in November of next year.
That’s exactly what Republican legislative leaders wanted, and most political analysts expected, even though plaintiffs made a strong argument for a special election to happen.
The GOP also wanted to wait until Nov. 15th to produce new redistricting maps, saying that they needed the extra time to holding public hearings, but the three-judge panel clearly was buying that argument during last week’s hearing.
“We agree with Plaintiffs that the General Assembly already has had ample time to enact a remedial redistricting plan,” stated judged Eagles, Wynn and Schroeder in their unanimous ruling Monday. “We also agree that constitutionally adequate districts should be enacted as quickly as possible to protect the rights of North Carolina citizens and to minimize any chilling effect on political participation attributable to the continued absence of a districting plan in the face of a finding of unconstitutional racial gerrymandering.”
Republican legislative leaders have one week after enacting the new maps to submit them to the court to review, along with any supporting documentation. Plaintiffs then have until Sept. 15th to file any challenges and objections to the remedied maps, and to submit they own redistricting plans.
State lawmakers say that even though 28 legislative districts have been ruled unconstitutional per the 2011 redistricting map, all 170 House and Senate districts may have to be redrawn in order to make sure that all of them are in compliance because of needed boundary adjustments.
Allison Riggs, senior attorney at the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, which represented plaintiffs in the case, said in a statement Monday, “The court’s decision affirms the urgency with which we must address this wrong committed against North Carolina voters”
“Despite operating as an unconstitutional body, the General assembly tried to delay redrawing maps until Nov. 15th.  This prompt redrawing will allow North Carolinians to at least rest assured, knowing which districts they will be living in come the November 2018 elections, and that the federal court will be reviewing the remedial plans closely to ensure they’re legal.”
One thing was evident, however, during the three-hour federal court hearing last week – judges Wynn and Eagles made it clear they suspected GOP lawmakers were deliberately dragging their feet to remedy the matter in order to put potential Democratic challengers at a disadvantage prior to the 2018 elections.
“What concerns me is the seriousness at how this is being taken by the General Assembly,” Judge Wynn said. “This is serious.”
“We want to feel that you’re moving on this,” Wynn added, suggesting to Phillip Strach, attorney for the state, the defendants, that the court could appoint a special master to oversee redrawing the districts if Republican lawmakers dragged their feet further.
“You don’t seem serious,” Judge Eagles bluntly said to attorney Strach, who countered that just the day before GOP legislative leaders appointed a new redistricting committee in hopes to have new maps drawn by November. 
Strach added that hearings across the state had to be held, and that’s why redrawing the districts couldn’t happen in just two weeks.
But a very skeptical Judge Eagles swasn’t buying it, snapping back that “…you’ve created this problem by not doing anything over the last year,” she said. “That’s the legislature’s fault.”
That three-judge federal panel ruled in August 2016 that the 2011 maps were unconstitutional because Republicans deliberately “stacked-and-packed,” or racially gerrymandered black Democratic voters in 28 counties in order to lessen their election influence.
Republican legislative leaders later appealed that ruling to the US Supreme Court, only to have the High Court affirm the ruling in June, but question whether holding special elections was appropriate, thus sending the case back to the lower court.
In their late ruling Monday evening the three-judge panel also ordered that a one-year North Carolina residency requirement be waived for citizens to run in the Nov. 2018 mid-term legislative elections.
NCGOP Executive Director Dallas Woodhouse was not pleased with that part of the ruling, later tweeting, “Greatly concerned that three judge panel is nullifying the Constitutional residency requirements for General Assembly.”
But no only did Rep. Craig Meyer (D-Durham, Orange), chairman of the House Democratic Caucus have no problem with tweeted that not having a special election was fine because it gave prospective democratic candidates more time to prepare and fundraise for the 2018 elections. 
He also sent out a fundraising letter Monday evening saying in part, “When Republicans unconstitutionally gerrymandered legislative maps in 2011, they gave themselves an unprecedented advantage in every election since and you've seen the damage they have done with their majority. New maps will wipe that advantage away and help us break the majority.
NCNAACP  Pres. Bishop Barber further blasted the GOP, saying that power, for them, is the name of the game.
The sad truth …that must be tied is [Republican legislative leaders] used racist tactics to get power and then used that power to deny health care, living wages, rights for the LGBTQ community, etc., which meant the people hurt the most in raw numbers were the poor and working poor whites.”
The House Redistricting Committee is scheduled to meet again on Friday.
-30-

OPPONENTS EXPECT NEW
VOTER SUPPRESSION BILL
By Cash Michaels
Contributing writer

With the Republican-led legislature reconvening today for the first of two special sessions, there are concerns that part of the agenda beyond overriding Gov. Cooper’s vetoes, redrawing legislative voting maps, and tinkering with judicial districts, will be to pass another law designed restrict voter access to the polls.
“A new voter suppression bill is coming soon,” warned Bob Hall, executive director of Democracy NC, a nonpartisan public policy advocacy group, in a mass email to supporters last week
“They’ve also been threatening for months to revive provisions of the 2013  Monster Voting Law, including a new photo ID bill that will target certain North Carolinians, harm eligible voters,  and trigger more costly litigation.”
Though GOP legislative leaders haven’t laid out exactly what they’ll be introducing, they’ve been sending strong signals ever since the US Supreme Court last May refused to take up the unconstitutionality of the 2013 voter ID law, thus leaving a 2016 US Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that the measure targeted African-American voters for suppression with “almost surgical precision” in place.
“We can only wonder if the intent is to reopen the door for voter fraud…said Senate Pro tem Pres. Phil Berger and House Speaker Tim Moore in an issued reaction.
When the US High Court affirmed the lower court ruling in May, Berger and Moore “…said North Carolina residents can bet that GOP legislators will keep fighting, reported the Associated Press then. “The leaders of the Republican-dominated General Assembly want to implement what they call a "commonsense requirement" to show a photo ID when voting.”
Even former Republican Gov. Pat McCrory, apparently still smarting from losing a close reelection bid to Democrat Roy Cooper, pushed for a new voter ID law in June while speaking at the NC Republican Convention.
“I know for a fact that we had a lot of noncitizens that were voting,” McCrory told the crowd of delegates. “Ladies and gentlemen, voter ID would have stopped it. Keep it a clean bill, stay with a voter ID law and get that passed.”
Between now and the second scheduled special session next month, Democratic lawmakers and voting rights activists fully expect to Republicans in the House and Senate act on McCrory’s advice.
“I hear the same,” says state Rep. Evelyn Terry (D-Forysth).
I am extremely concerned about HB 717 judicial maps that force force district court judges of the same political party to compete in a primary. That equates to worse. It is called double bunking.”
Rep. Terry concluded, “Next week is for show as much as anything.”
“We fully expect this legislature that [Bishop] Barber called “unconstitutionally constituted” to continue to do all they can to maintain power, said Forsyth County NAACP Pres. Rev. Alvin Carlisle. “ This extremist legislature fully understands that fair elections will mean an end to their tyrannical reign. We must continue to utilize the judicial process to secure fair voting maps for North Carolinians. The continued efforts of the powerful to silence the voice of the masses continues to paint NC in a negative light.”
Rep. Cecil Brockman (D – Guilford) agrees.
“As of now I have not seen any legislation regarding voter ID for the upcoming session. However, this discriminatory practice—aimed to keep black citizens from voting—has already been struck down once in our courts,” Rep. Brockman said. “It would be insulting and unnecessary for this to be brought up again. Lawmakers should oppose any new voter ID bill and focus on ensuring free and fair elections.” 
-30-

STATE NEWS BRIEFS FOR 08-03-17

TWO GOP CONGRESSMAN REFUSE TO BACK POST OFFICE RENAMING BECAUSE OF JESSE HELMS
[DURHAM] Two North Carolina Republican congressmen are reportedly refusing to join First District G. K. Butterfield, a Democrat, in cosponsoring his bill to rename the US Post Office and federal building in downtown Durham after John Hervey Wheeler, one-time president of Mechanics and Farmers Bank, because he previously refused to back their bill to name another federal building in the state after controversial North Carolina US Senator Jesse Helms. 
Butterfield says congressmen George Holding and Robert Pittinger are the only two from the North Carolina congressional delegation who have refused to cosponsor his Wheeler bill. When asked why he would not back the Helms naming bill, Butterfield replied, ““Senator Jesse Helms was repugnant. He demonstrated racist behavior and imposed on North Carolina an image that we have yet to recover from.”
A spokesperson for Rep. Holding said the federal building to be named after Helms is in his district, and naming it should be “his choice.”
John Wheeler was not only head of the Durham Committee on the Affairs of Black People, but also a personal mentor to a young G. K. Butterfield during the mid-1960s.
Rep. Butterfield’s bill is currently in the US. House committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. If it is voted out of committee, it goes to the House floor, and if passed there, on to the US Senate for ratification.

LAWSUIT FILED IN OUTER BANKS POWER OUTAGE CASE
[OCRAKOKE] A class action lawsuit has been filed against the construction company that accidentally damaged the power lines leading to Ocrakoke and Hatteras islands last week, causing massive power outages, and forcing thousands of tourists to evacuate, businesses to close, and vacation plans cancelled. Two owners of vacation rentals are suing PCL Construction, saying that their properties have been “negatively impacted” a a result. Gov. Cooper has declared a state of emergency on the southern end of the Outer Banks. Repair crews say it could at least a week before the damage is fixed and power is restored. Gov. Cooper said the state will see if the revenue lost to the businesses can be reimbursed.

UNC BOARD COMMITTEE VOTES TO BAN LITIGATION AT CIVIL RIGHTS CENTER
[CHAPEL HILL] Saying that the UNC Center for Civil Rights is “a school, not a law firm,” a committee of the all-Republican UNC Board of Governors voted 5-1, with one abstention, to ban the center from litigating any further cases or provide legal advice. The center, started by the late civil rights attorney Julius Chambers, often represents the poor in cases involving government. The center is privately funded, but Republicans want the litigation service stopped, saying that the school should not act as a law firm. Supporters of the center say it provides an important service to the community, especially those in need of legal representation. The full board is scheduled to consider the issue at it’s Sept. 8th meeting.
-30-