LIKE THE REST OF THE
COUNTRY, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARES FOR ICE/BORDER
PATROL RETURN
By Cash Michaels
Contributing writer
Even though two white American citizens were killed in Minneapolis, Minnesota by federal Border Patrol agents, the rest of the nation, including North Carolina, has now been placed on notice - Immigration Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol will continue to spread out and even return to areas they've been, looking for people who are deemed to be in the country illegally.
For the Tar Heel State, that means federal agents will be returning here, and probably bringing back the tactics that wrought fear through communities of color, mostly Hispanic, last November. But for those who are Haitian, Venezuelan, or maybe international students or former students who either are attending college, or have overstayed a visa, and have settled in North Carolina to build a new life, there are grave concerns about being tracked down, taken away from their families, and shipped away someplace else without due process.
Few people argue against the country’s borders being secured. But the tragic events in Minneapolis in January, combined with numerous episodes of alleged brutality by ICE/Border Patrol agents in Chicago, Los Angeles, Memphis, Portland, Oregon and other predominately Democratic cities with large immigrant populations, have sent a chill throughout the nation.
Thousands of demonstrators in Raleigh, Charlotte, Durham and elsewhere in North Carolina have marched the streets, calling for ICE/Border Patrol to be reigned in .
“There is absolutely no reason why you cannot have basic accountability for ICE/Border Patrol,” North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein , a former state attorney general, told The News&Observer last week. “They can wear body arms. They can have their name on their uniforms. They do not have to wear masks. They can have relationships with state and local (governments) where they’re informing them of what their actions are. These things are basic measures of accountability of good law enforcement.”
Stein’s immediate predecessor, former Gov. Roy Cooper, who is running for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by North Carolina Republican incumbent Thom Tillis, agrees, and is also in line with other Senate Democrats holding up U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security funding until the behavior of its ICE/border Patrol agents in the field is straightened out.
“The federal government should deport violent criminals, but instead they have killed American citizens,” Cooper said in a statement last week. “Americans deserve answers and any additional funding for these ICE operations must come with immediate reforms that stop this chaos and keep people safe.”
Sen. Tillis has called for the resignation of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who oversees ICE/Border Patrol. Another NC Republican, Congressman Chuck Edwards of Western North Carolina said that while he supports the federal officers doing their duty, “…I fully support the formally requested testimony from ICE, CBP, & USCIS leaders at a full Homeland Security Committee hearing.”
Beyond Tillis and Edwards, few if any North Carolina Republicans have gone on record with concerns about ICE/Border Patrol, leaving reaction to Democrats.
Second District Rep. Deborah Ross said, “The American people do not want violent, untrained, armed agents terrorizing our communities. There must be justice and accountability.
Fourth District Congresswoman Valerie Foushee said, “ICE puts every single one of us at risk. Trump is allowing a federal agency to violate rights and take lives, and Congress’ continued inaction is complicity.
First District Congressman Don Davis said, “ Over the recent days, I have heard from people across the country expressing their desire for accountability and humanity. Our immigration laws can and must be enforced with respect for life and dignity…The Trump administration must take immediate and decisive action to bring an end to this violence and disorder that have taken lives and undermined public trust.”
-30-
COLLEGE DEMOCRATS, STUDENTS
SUE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS
OVER DENIAL OF CAMPUS VOTING
SITES
By Cash Michaels
Contributing writer
With early voting beginning Feb. 12th and ending Feb. 28th for the March 3rd midterm primary elections, students at three universities, along with the College Democrats of North Carolina, are suing the state Board of Elections (SBE) in federal court because that Republican-led body refused to allow voting precincts on their campuses. Students want those sites opened by Feb. 12th.
Students from NC A&T State University, UNC-Greensboro and Western Carolina University filed the litigation in federal court January 27th, claiming that the SBE is violating their constitutional rights to vote by restricting their access to convenient on-campus voting because of their age.
Each campus did have an early voting site during the 2024 presidential elections.
Officials with the Guilford County Board of Elections and in Jackson County were also included in the lawsuit.
“This case is about targeted efforts to place additional, unnecessary, burdensome, and ultimately unjustifiable obstacles between students at three North Carolina universities — including the nation’s largest historically Black university — and this fundamental constitutional right, “ the lawsuit states, adding, “For multiple election cycles, [over 40,000] students have been able to vote early at early voting sites on their campuses. Having that on-campus access has been no mere convenience — it has been critical for overcoming the barriers that student voters face when they attempt to access the franchise, including lack of personal transportation, unfamiliarity with off-campus geography, demanding class and work schedules that leave little time for travel, and limited financial resources. For many students, on-campus early voting enables access to the franchise.”
“Moreover…,” the federal lawsuit continued, “… because same day voter registration is available at early voting sites and not election day polling sites, the on-campus accessibility was critical to ensuring not only that registered voters were able to vote, but that young North Carolinians who were voting for the very first time or updating their voter registration were able to do so in time to participate in the state’s elections.”
The students’ lawsuit maintained that the SBE’s Jan. 13th decision not to allow early voting sites on the college campuses “…would disproportionately burden young and Black voters and denigrated students who advocated for their rights [and] intentionally target the rights of young voters.”
Republican election board members have generally offered that on-campus early voting sites were problematic because of problems with parking, and weak early voting totals in the past. Those GOP board members maintained that the cost of opening those early voting sites did not justify the expense or the effort.
But in the lawsuit, the college students had an answer for that.
“The real reason for the elimination of on-campus early voting at these universities appears to be a judgment that student voters — and disproportionately Black student voters — do not deserve the same level of accessibility as other voters in their counties. That judgment contradicts the Constitution and basic principles of equal treatment.”
Republican conservatives counter that there will be more early voting sites across the state this midterm primary election than during the last one in 2022. Conservatives also argue that NC A&T State University has never had a midterm primary early voting site, so students there aren’t losing anything. They note that of the 17 early voting sites in Guilford County for the 2024 elections, the one that was least used was on NC A&T’s campus.
But advocates for the A&T midterm early voting site argue because NC A&T never had a midterm early voting site before does not mean it shouldn’t have one now. And if generating more on-campus early voting traffic is an issue for the campus, then maybe the Guilford County Board of Elections should work with the school to help generate more traffic there, instead of eliminating it.
Several students from NC A&T traveled from Greensboro to Raleigh on January 13th to demand a midterm early voting site at their school. Instead of denying them their right, observers say, election officials should have immediately pledged to work with them to improve the situation there.
-30-
