Tuesday, August 26, 2025

THE NEW CASH COMMENTARY FOR AUGUST 28, 2025

                           

                                              CASH MICHAELS         

WELCOME TO NORTH CAROLINA, MADAM JUSTICE!

by Cash Michaels


One of the many blessings of the Biden Administration we got before being stuck in the fascist sinkhole we’re currently in, was a brilliant young black woman who made history when President Biden appointed her to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2022.

Her name is Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Justice Jackson, 54, is currently one of three so-called “liberal” justices on the highest court in our land, and in recent years, has become probably the most outspoken in her legal opinions dissenting from the six-member conservative majority on the Supreme Court.

Justice Jackson has proven herself to be bold and outspoken, yet displaying a fine legal acumen, and intuitive awareness of the important implications each decision from the court has on the average American.

So why am I bringing Justice Jackson up here, and now?

Because next Wednesday, September 3rd at 6 p.m. in the Harrison Auditorium on the campus of the largest historically black university in the nation, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University in Greensboro, Justice Jackson will be speaking as part of her book tour promoting her #1 New York Times bestseller titled,“Lovely One.”

For the record, “Lovely One” is the translation of the West African name her aunt gave her at birth, “Ketanji.”

        The book is a memoir about Justice Jackson’s life growing up in Miami, Florida; being influenced by her parents (her father, Johnny Brown, graduated from North Carolina Central University in Durham earning his bachelor’s degree in history); attending and graduating from Harvard University and Harvard Law; and then earning her way up the legal ranks, becoming an assistant federal public defender; then an Assistant Special Counsel at the Sentencing Commission; later nominated by Pres. Barack Obama and confirmed to be a U.S District Court judge in the District of Columbia; and finally, reaching the pinnacle of her profession when chosen by Pres. Joe Biden and confirmed by the U.S. Senate, 53-47 to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court as an Associate Justice, making history.

        "We've taken another step toward making our highest court reflect the diversity of America," Biden once wrote. "She will be an incredible Justice, and I was honored to share this moment with her."

Justice Jackson is expected to share her life story only with N.C. A&T State University students, faculty and staff during her speech (her audience is understandably restricted), and I’m glad she will, because the students there, in particular, need to hear from this impressive young woman of history firsthand so that they can individually examine their personal life trajectories, and gain inspiration from this extraordinary legal leader.

Like so many other academically and experientially talented and gifted young black professionals Donald “I am not a dictator” Trump is trying to wipe off the face of this planet, Justice Jackson was ready when the call came for greatness.

Politically in part, yes, she got the job as an associate justice on the U.S. Supreme Court because she is black, but that wasn’t the only reason, as her new book will undoubtedly document and prove.

Ketanji Brown Jackson also got the position because long before she was born, no one white and in power ever considered making sure that a qualified black woman served on the highest court of this land in its over 230 year history, representing a part of America deserving a voice in how laws that affect everyone are decided and enforced.

I’m not knocking Justice Thurgood Marshall, the first black man to ever serve on the high court in 1967, but his choice is no excuse for there not also being a black woman at least nominated long before just three years ago. Same goes for Marshall's successor, Justice Clarence Thomas, who joined the court in 1991.

So it took over 230 years for a qualified black female jurist to make it onto the nation’s highest bench, and history chose Ketanji Brown Jackson, not New York City Judge Jane Matilda Bolin (appointed by Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia in 1939 and the first African-American judge ever in United States history), or the legendary U.S. District Court Judge Constance Baker Motley (appointed to the federal bench in 1966, clerked for Justice Marshall, and was the first African-American female attorney to argue before the U.S. Supreme Court), or any of the other brilliant black female legal practitioners who were insidiously not allowed to successfully rise to the level of U.S. Supreme Court associate justice before now.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, NYC Judge Bolin, federal Judge Motley, our very own former NC Supreme Court Chief Justice Cheri Beasley and many other unknown but brilliant, experienced and qualified black women judges across our country, are one of the reasons why we have DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) policies, or at least what’s left of them.

It makes me shudder to think of all of the tremendous, qualified talent of all colors, ethnicities and genders we’re now losing because, as a country, we no longer respect the tremendous power DEI gave us in private industry and government.

I commend Justice Jackson for choosing NC A&T State University and its students for her visit, and to share her unique story and message with. The students there are learned and accomplished, and they deserve to be recognized for their achievements in the fields of agricultural and scientific research, though Lord only knows the Trump Administration will pull the fiscal rug out from under them as fast as you can say “letter from the government,” spuriously claiming that the tens of millions of federal dollars NC A &T gets for all of that research is wasted because the university is practicing “vile racism” by being a predominately black school.

Wait, watch and see. It’s coming.

And that’s another reason why Justice Jackson’s visit there Sept. 3rd is so vitally important. She has a front row seat to witness her conservative majority colleagues on the high court literally change the rules of the road, effectively backing the Trump Administration as it grabs more and more power for the executive branch, all the while corrupting the legislative, and ignoring the lower judicial branches except when it suits its purposes.

Most importantly, Justice Jackson, in her powerful dissents representing the “liberal” minority on the court, is boldly speaking out against what she’s seeing, and making clear in the process that members of the conservative majority - three of whom are Trump appointed - are accomplices to the dangers and damage caused by a runaway president who has every intention to choke the life out of democracy as we know it.

She’s already seen that damage and danger firsthand when Trump’s angry mob of white supremacists tried to take the U.S. Capitol by force and overthrow the federal government on January 6th, 2021. Justice Jackson came on the court with her eyes already open to what the American people would have to deal with. 

Even before ever being nominated to the Supreme Court, then U.S. District Court Judge Jackson definitely got on Trump’s bad side when she ruled against him in a 2019 decision mandating that his former White House Counsel Don McGann cooperate with Congress during its impeachment proceedings against the president.

Jackson issued a 118-page ruling stating, “presidents are not kings” and “no one is above the law.”

When White House attorneys balked and argued that Judge Jackson didn’t know what the hell she was talking about, and that her order “…contradicts longstanding legal precedent established by administrations of both parties,” Jackson astutely countered, "Absolute testimonial immunity for senior-level White House aides appears to be a fiction that has been fastidiously maintained over time through the force of sheer repetition.”

In other words, just because you’ve always done it wrong, fellas, and gotten away with it, doesn’t make it legal or right now!

Three years later, Judge Jackson is on the U.S. Supreme Court. Wanna explain to me again how the only reason why Biden chose her to serve on there was because she’s black?

And that’s not the last time Justice Jackson has stuck Trump’s nose in it.

When lower federal courts disallowed the Trump Administration from terminating $783 million in federal National Health Institute grants for scientific and medical research recently, and the Supreme Court’s conservative majority reversed them, that reversal came with a warning, reports CNN:

“Lower court judges may sometimes disagree with this court’s decisions, but they are never free to defy them,” Justice Neil Gorsuch admonished in an opinion for the right-wing majority last week when deciding to allow Trump to cancel the in research grants.

But Justice Jackson caught Gorsuch doing Trump’s dirty work, and issued a fiery dissent charging, "The Court also lobs this grenade without evaluating Congress’ intent or the profound legal and practical consequences of this ruling," further noting that “…potentially life-saving scientific advancements [are] on the line.”

Jackson added, The forward march of scientific discovery will not only be halted — it will be reversed. That’s what happens when you make up the rules as you go to help your side win.”

Stopping scientific discovery, however, is the least of the Trump Administration’s extraordinary attempts to make the federal judiciary bow and heel to its whims.

On Tuesday, a federal judge from Virginia had to throw out DOJ’s inexplicable lawsuit against all 15 federal judges in Maryland. The chief judge there had “stopped the immediate deportation of migrants [and] challenged their removals,” and DOJ didn't like it, reported The Associated Press. The Justice Dept, which will appeal, countered that no judge has the right to “impede the president’s authority to enforce immigration laws,” and decided to sue.

That Virginia U.S. District Court judge, Thomas Cullen, not only stopped DOJ’s ridiculous and spiteful lawsuit, but “criticized the administration’s attacks on the judiciary, highlighting in a footnote that White House officials in recent months had described judges as “rogue,” “unhinged” and “crooked,” among other epithets.”

Get this - Judge Cullen was nominated by Trump to the federal bench!

So Madam Justice isn’t the only federal jurist peeping what Trump and his gang are up to when it comes to trying to diminish the power of the judiciary over him.

In July, during a personal appearance hosted by the Indianapolis Bar Association, when asked by the moderator, “What keeps you up at night?”Justice Jackson replied, “I would say the state of our democracy.”

She added that she was “…really very interested in getting people to focus …and to pay attention to what is happening in our country and in our government.”

        Amen, Madam Justice!

More from CNN:

“Perhaps the degradation of our rule-of-law regime would happen anyway,” Jackson wrote in her June 27 dissent in the case related to Trump’s effort to end birthright citizenship. “But this court’s complicity in the creation of a culture of disdain for lower courts, their rulings, and the law (as they interpret it) will surely hasten the downfall of our governing institutions, enabling our collective demise.”

Earlier, in April, in another strong dissent, Jackson invoked the court’s notorious 1944 case of Korematsu v. United States, when the justices upheld the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II.

Jackson derided the current court majority’s decision to let the administration use the 18th-century Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan nationals to El Salvador. The majority had acted swiftly on the administration’s appeal in the controversy over the 1798 wartime law, issuing an unsigned, brief four-page opinion.

“At least when the Court went off base in the past,” Jackson wrote, “it left a record so posterity could see how wrong it went.” In the controversy at hand, Jackson noted, the court decided the matter without the usual briefing or public arguments, leaving, as she wrote, “less and less of a trace. But make no mistake: We are just as wrong now as we have been in the past, with similarly devastating consequences. It just seems we are now less willing to face it.”

Fellow dissenters in the Alien Enemies Act case declined to join her words.

And when it came to the conservative majority’s June, 2023 decision outlawing affirmative action in college admissions. Justice Jackson did not spare the rod: 

“The best that can be said of the majority’s perspective is that it proceeds (ostrich-like) from the hope that preventing consideration of race will end racism. But if that is its motivation, the majority proceeds in vain.”

“Gulf-sized race-based gaps exist with respect to the health, wealth and well-being of American citizens. They were created in the distant past, but have indisputably been passed down to the present day through generations. Every moment these gaps persist is a moment in which this great country falls short of actualizing one of its founding principles - the “self-evident” truth that all of us are created equal. Yet, today, the Court determines that holistic admissions programs like the one that the University of North Carolina (UNC) has operated…consistent with [settled law], are a problem with respect to achievement of that aspiration, rather than a viable solution (as has long been evident to historians, sociologists and policymakers alike).”

I’m sorry that the allotted space here will not allow me to reprint Justice Jackson’s entire brilliant dissenting opinion on the conservative majority’s outlawing of affirmative action, but I’m just glad she’s on the U.S. Supreme Court where she belongs, serving us all.

U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, welcome to North Carolina! In the slight chance that you see this commentary, I bring you heartfelt greetings from all of us who, like you, lament the slow and deliberate destruction of our democracy, and truly cherish our constitutional right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of justice and happiness.

As you once said, “the president is NOT king” and “no one is above the law.”

        Amen, my "sista," amen!

Welcome to North Carolina, Madam Justice!

  -30-

                                        

               





Sunday, August 24, 2025

THE CASH STUFF FOR AUGUST 28, 2025

                            U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE KETANJI BROWN JACKSON

JUSTICE KETANJI BROWN JACKSON

TO SPEAK AT N.C. A&T U SEPT 3RD

By Cash Michaels

Contributing writer


Outspoken Associate Justice Ketanji Onyika Brown Jackson, 54, the first African-American woman ever to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court, and one of that body’s three liberal member minority, is scheduled to speak at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University next week on Wednesday, Sept. 3rd at 6 p.m..

The event will be held in the school’s Harrison Auditorium, and is restricted to NC A&T students, faculty and staff.

Justice Jackson’s appearance is part of her current tour to support her New York Times #1 bestselling book “Lovely One.” The memoir chronicles her early life growing up in Miami, Florida, going on to earn her bachelor’s and law degrees from Harvard, becoming a federal public defender and ultimately being appointed by Pres. Joe Biden to the U.S. high court in 2022 after serving as U.S. District Court judge for the District of Columbia.

Her father, Johnny Brown, attended North Carolina Central University, graduating with a degree in history, and later serving as a school principal.

Beyond her chart-topping book, Justice Jackson is very much in the news lately for her fiery dissenting opinions on the 6-3 conservative majority Supreme Court.

Just last week on the Supreme Court’s last day of its current term, in a split decision on the emergency docket where the conservative majority voted, without argument, to allow Republican Pres. Donald Trump to cancel almost $800 million in federal National Institutes of Health grants for medical and scientific research, Justice Jackson, calling the majority’s decision “of a piece with the Court’s recent tendencies, added, “‘[R]ight when the Judiciary should be hunkering down to do all it can to preserve the law’s constraints,’ the Court opts instead to make vindicating the rule of law and preventing manifestly injurious Government action as difficult as possible.” 

“This is Calvinball jurisprudence with a twist. Justice Jackson continued, referring to a children’s comic strip game. “Calvinball has only one rule: There are no fixed rules. We seem to have two: that one, and this Administration always wins.”

Justice Jackson concluded, “The court’s Calvinball jurisprudence will have grim consequences.The forward march of scientific discovery will not only be halted — it will be reversed. That’s what happens when you make up the rules as you go to help your side win.”

Knowing that sometimes strong dissenting court opinions can sometimes have as much social impact as majority opinions, Justice Jackson has made clear that she is not afraid to use her voice. She has not been afraid to chide the court’s conservative majority for for strengthening and extending Pres. Trump’s executive powers, even ruling that he enjoys immunity from prosecution for most crimes committed while in office.

In July during an appearance hosted by the Indianapolis Bar Association, when asked “What keeps you up at night?,” Justice Jackson replied, "I would say the state of our democracy.” 

“I’m really very interested in getting people to focus ...and to pay attention to what is happening in our country and in our government," Justice Jackson added.

-30-



                                                    REP. ALMA ADAMS


REP. ADAMS BLASTS TRUMP

FOR ATTACK MUSEUMS

THAT INFORM ABOUT SLAVERY

By Cash Michaels

Contributing writer


Congresswoman and former college professor Alma Adams (D-1-NC) took high offense to Republican President Donald Trump’s recent attack on the Smithsonian Museum, and particularly its National Museum of African-American History in Washington, D.C., which he once visited in his first term and praised, for allegedly teaching “How bad slavery was” and nothing about success.

“The Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL,” the president opined on his social media platform, Truth Social, last week,"…where everything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been — Nothing about Success, nothing about Brightness, nothing about the Future.” 

Rep. Adams, who taught art for forty years at Bennett College for Women in Greensboro, was having none of it.

“President Trump fundamentally misunderstands the role museums play in telling the story of America,” said Adams said in a statement last week. “Museums are centers of preservation, of culture, of speaking unapologetically to the history of our country—its greatest achievements and its darkest moments. The eras of slavery, segregation, and internment cannot be whitewashed because they make some people uncomfortable. Museums were never built for comfort. They’re built for learning, understanding, and chronicling the truth of our past.”

According to The Independent, The Trump administration is on a crusade against institutions of learning, from universities to museums, to ensure they align with a narrative that presents history in a way that glorifies the nation rather than documents and explains the American historical journey warts and all.”

Trump called museums in Washington, D.C. and throughout the nation “…the last remaining segment of ‘WOKE,’” and threatened to have his attorneys review all museum exhibit materials to determine if they fit his cultural and historical narrative. If so, they’ll be removed.

“…I have instructed my attorneys to go through the Museums, and start the exact same process that has been done with Colleges and Universities where tremendous progress has been made.” Trump stated.

“This Country cannot be WOKE, because WOKE IS BROKE. We have the ‘HOTTEST’ Country in the World, and we want people to talk about it, including in our Museums.”

Trump’s Truth Social posting came a week after The White House announced a “…sweeping review” of the Smithsonian Institution, which operates some of the nation’s top museums, in a letter stating that it “aims to ensure alignment with the President’s directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions.”

Trump’s attack on museums that tell the true story of slavery has drawn an avalanche of criticism, as well as plenty of MAGA supporting comments that tried to minimize the institution of slavery for its documented cruelty.

        Sarah Weicksel, executive director of the American Historical Association, told WTOP News in Washington, D.C. that what the White House was doing was “appalling,” and the president’s directive “is the imposition of a single, ideological, highly partisan, politicized version of history. That is not an effort to ensure that content is in line with up-to-date scholarship, …and would deprive Americans “access to a full, unvarnished version of the American past that is told in all of its complexity and all of its messiness.”

Rep. Adams added, “The president can try to remove our history from museums but make no mistake, that will not silence the American people,” she said. “We will keep acknowledging it, discussing it, and learning from it as we build for the future.”

-30-











 

Monday, August 18, 2025

THE NEW CASH COMMENTARY FOR AUGUST 21st, 2025


                                                                   CASH MICHAELS

         HOMEBOY GOT PLAYED

           by Cash Michaels


I know this will probably offend many of you who insist on your geopolitical analysis to be high-minded, well-versed and intellectually challenging, but from where I come from in Brooklyn, N.Y., there is only one way to describe what happened last Friday when dictator-wannabe Trump fell all over himself welcoming KGB master-spy, criminal butcher and Russian president, Vladimir Putin, to a U.S Air Force base in Alaska, seemingly for ceasefire talks concerning the Russia-Ukraine war.

Homeboy got played!

Now, for those of you who are not familiar with New York City street vernacular, “homeboy” is usually a term of endearment, meaning the man in question is someone we normally and unquestionably care about and embrace.

But no, no… NYET in this situation!

We call Donald Trump “homeboy” here only to mock him, to show that even though he was supposed to be representing all of the American people as president when he effusively clapped, shook hands with, and treated Putin like a long lost cousin last Friday, clearly he was not representing anyone but himself.

        NOT when there are arrest warrants for Putin from the International Criminal Court in 125 countries for alleged war crimes in Ukraine.

For if Trump were properly and ably representing all of the American people when he welcomed this tyrant, fugitive and indicted war criminal to our shores, he would have kept one absolute fact in mind, and treated Putin accordingly:

Putin illegally invaded Ukraine, NOT the other way around, in February, 2022, and Russia still illegally occupies and controls 20% of that independent nation’s territory by force to this day, and wants to occupy and control more, not giving anything up (in 2014, Russia also invaded, and illegally annexed the Crimean Peninsula in Ukraine, 23 years after that nation declared its independence from the former Soviet Union in 1991).

Since 2022, according to a United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry Report of Sept. 2022, Russian troops have “raped, tortured and unlawfully confined” thousands of Ukrainian people, including children.

“There are examples of cases where relatives were forced to witness the crimes," a UN official close to the commission said. "In the cases we have investigated, the age of victims of sexual and gendered-based violence ranged from 4 to 82 years."

        In March of this year, Ukraine alleged at least 150,000 war crimes have been committed by Russian troops thus far.

Raping helpless children and the elderly. Killing innocent people. And this monster gets a red carpet welcome to our country from our president?!!! My GOD!

Those simple facts mean that Putin is the bully here, the war criminal, NOT Ukraine. And yet, Trump treats Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy like dog crap on the back of his shoe, NOT Putin, who Trump is definitely afraid and in awe of.

In fact, Trump once disrespectfully called Zelenskyy “a dictator without elections;” blamed Joe Biden for the conflict; bragged that it would have never started if he were in office in 2022; and falsely accused the Ukrainian president of starting the war with Russia; earning Politifact’s infamous Pants on Fire moniker.

Boy, you’ve got to be lower than low to earn even one of those. Trump excels with at least four on the same subject.

But there’s no question Trump has mad respect for Putin. He knows that Vladdy is a better dictator than he’ll ever be, and Trump also knows that Putin has powers that the dictator-wannabe is only still dreaming of - like rigging elections (they both discussed how “corrupt” mail-in ballots are and doing away with voting machines); targeting political enemies with retribution; invading other nations in territorial conquest; grabbing total control of the government, the courts and the media; sending in the military to carry out his will on the homeland; making law without Congress; putting down political dissidents; and killing any opposition.

The word for “democracy” in Russia is "демократия" (pronounced "demokratia”), used only in political discussions. If Trump could legally outlaw it here in this country, he’d do so in a heartbeat.

No murderous world leader has ever gotten the kind of royal welcome here that Trump gave Putin last Friday, showing how much Trump aspires to be like Vladdy.

Which one can reasonably interpret to mean that Trump wants to be a murderous dictator too, I assume.

And don’t forget what turned out to be empty threats - that if Putin came and did not agree to a ceasefire with Ukraine, there would be “very severe consequences” from Trump.

Yeah, well Vladdy came and went, with no Ukrainian ceasefire deal reached, and nothing happened. Putin wants peace with Ukraine, like I want fried donkey meat for dinner. 

Pres. Zelenskyy says "If they do not have the will to implement a simple order to stop the attacks, it may take a great deal of effort to get Russia to implement something much more significant, namely peaceful coexistence with its neighbors for decades to come.”

In other words, if Putin can’t agree to stop the bullets, drones and long-range missiles flying from his side just so that the unnecessary loss of life ceases now while peace is being considered, then how can he be trusted to do likewise if a peace deal is actually reached?

And what the hell kind of “peace deal” could possibly have been reached between Russia and Ukraine last Friday if Ukraine wasn’t even invited to the table?

The Nordic-Baltic Eight countries, consisting of Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway and Sweden certainly don’t trust Vladdy. The regional block of nations issued the following statement after the joke of a Putin-Trump Summit fizzled out:

"Experience has shown that Putin cannot be trusted," their statement said. "Ultimately it is Russia's responsibility to end its blatant violations of international law. Russia's aggression and imperialist ambitions are the root causes of this war."

Boy, when peace lovers like Norway, Sweden and Denmark tell the rest of the world to lock their doors and draw the blinds if they see you coming, you really must be bad news!

So what does Trump, his Sec. of State Marco Rubio and other MAGA Administration officials have to say about all of this now?

“Never mind the ceasefire. What we really want is a peace accord. That would be better. And if Zelenskyy really wants peace, he has to make it happen by being ready to give up something to Russia!”

I thought there was a law against people playing with themselves on television? Trump and his folks know damn well that Putin only has one goal, and that’s grabbing as much of Ukraine back into the Russian fold as soon as possible, even if it costs much more than the  staggering total of over 1 million lives lost after over three years of fighting.

Shamefully, Trump is onboard with this.

From The Telegraph:

Donald Trump supports Vladimir Putin’s demand that Ukraine surrenders its most valuable region to Russia in order to end the war.

        The Russian leader wants full control of Donetsk, the mineral-rich eastern oblast including parts that are currently held by Ukraine within the wider Donbas region. In return, Putin said he would freeze the front line and promised not to take any more territory.”

        The term being used is "land swap. Here's what CNN says about that:

        The term “land swap” is the kind of phrase that conceals its true meaning. Ukraine would, under the Russian plan, essentially be engaging in bargaining for different parts of its own territory. Putin would get valuable strategic areas and offer, other less critical districts he’s already seized elsewhere inside Ukraine. It doesn’t seem much of a deal. Land swaps create epochal upheaval and seed future feuds — as the Middle East shows. In this case, they would mean telling thousands of Ukrainians they must leave home or become Russians. And Zelensky would have to explain to parents of fallen young Ukrainians why they died for territory to be given to Putin.

Trump also wants Zelenskyy to kiss Crimea goodbye forever, and forget about ever joining NATO.

Boy if Trump has Zelenskyy's back, it's only to hold it steady while Putin

shoves a knife into it.

Ukraine has been valiantly defending itself against Russian invaders with a lot of heart, a lot of courage, and a lot of weaponry secured from the United States before Trump got reelected.

Trump has said he wants to stop that, but at times, when his hero, Vladdy, pisses him off, he tries to talk tough by threatening to allow Ukraine to purchase more.

Bottomline here is that Putin knows Trump like a cheap sheet of music. The fact that he came here smiling last week, refusing to agree to a ceasefire, and walked away before lunch getting most of what he wanted, plus getting the grand world leader treatment to go with it, without giving away anything, all while on American soil, proves he knows how to play King Wannabe.

Putin simply can NOT be trusted to honor any so-called “agreement” that he feels is not in Russia’s best interest.

Top European leaders, concerned about this conflict eventually affecting their countries, know this, can’t stand the foolishness they’re seeing and hearing, and are all standing strong behind Zelenskyy and Ukraine, urging Trump to do the same. Those leaders made an impressive display joining Zelenskyy at the White House Monday to show that they aren’t bluffing about their support for Ukraine, or their disdain for Putin. 

They also made clear that if a peace deal is made, there must be NATO-like Article 5 guarantees for Ukraine’s long-term security to ensure that Russia never invades it again. That initially meant that among other nations, US. boots would be on the ground to help protect Ukraine.

        Those foreign leaders hadn't flown back home 24 hours before Trump was telling Fox News that he will NOT be sending American troops to help defend Ukraine. He did suggest that there are other ways to support a front line European military effort. 

        MAGA folks are high-fiving on that one.

        I’m sure at least one of those foreign leaders cussed Trump out behind closed doors for giving Putin the red carpet treatment they didn’t get. It’s a shame those leaders had to stop running their own countries, just to fly all the way to Washington Monday, and remind Trump to his face that he should treat Pres. Zelenskyy, who is an elected head of state, with more respect. Hell, Trump is supposed to be the leader of the Free World, and it’s high time somebody reminded him to start acting like it!

I hope, in the name of human decency, they also said something about doing more to alleviate the shameful mass starvation and abject suffering taking place in Gaza by the Israelis government.

The world simply must do more to save those people!

As far as Putin is concerned, he and Trump can talk until kingdom come about future Ukrainian security, a bilateral and trilateral meeting for peace, yada, yada, yada, and as long as he can keep killing Ukrainians and grabbing their territory at will, Putin could care less what the rest of the world thinks.

        Add to that French President Emmanuel Macron telling NBC News that Putin really isn’t interested in ending the war. And Trump is starting to let slip that his pal Vladdy really isn’t interested in a deal either. In fact, Russia officials are already dragging their feet setting any subsequent meetings up, with one official Wednesday saying that there can be no security arrangements for Ukraine if a peace agreement is ever reached without Russia’s say-so. 

       These people are talking out of all four sides of their mouths!

        So where does that really leave us?

To Putin, this is about conquest for Mother Russia, and nothing gets in the way of that.

So the prospect of a meeting just between Zelenskyy and Putin will be very interesting indeed, if it ever happens. Of course, Trump says he’s setting Zelen…I mean…the meeting up (tee-hee-hee). Bets are being taken now that it never happens.

        NBC News nailed the irony best:

“A man wanted for war crimes sitting across the table from the leader of the country he invaded?”

          A Russian expert who knows how Putin thinks, and the probable chess game he’s playing here, tells CNN, “Trump is seen as an enabler of (the) Russian vision of the settlement and for that the United States is supposed to work with Kyiv (Ukraine) to push them to be more flexible, to be more open to Russian demands.”

To Trump, this is all about trying to win a Nobel Peace Prize, and he’s hoping his dictator-mentor will help him get seriously considered.

And to us, it’s about watching from the sidelines, and knowing instinctively that this will not end well for anybody, especially the Ukrainians, who are bravely fighting for their freedom, and only ask the mightiest nation on the face of the planet to stand with them for something we’ve always taken for granted.

In my mind, it is very dangerous counting on Trump to assist anybody in gaining their freedom. That’s simply NOT in his bloodstream.

No, Trump’s involvement in this is strictly transactional, hoping to play both sides against the middle and coming out on top looking like a peacemaker for history’s sake. And don’t forget his side hustle - trying to get Zelenskyy to sign on the dotted line for certain precious mineral rights found only in Ukraine.

Can’t put it past the "America First"criminal king when it comes to making a buck off someone else’s desperation.

But Trump's already proven that he’s out of his league. There will be no Nobel Peace Prize for him out of all of this, according to Dr. Peter van den Dungen, Visiting Fellow, Norwegian Nobel Institute, 2000:

        "Trump’s MAGA programme is at the expense of other nations, causing anger and anxiety in Canada, Denmark, Greenland, Iceland and elsewhere. He is complicit in the destruction of the Palestinian nation and the continuing devastation of Ukraine. The fact that he has been nominated is of little consequence (Hitler was nominated too) and reflects poorly on the nominators." 

        The closest Trump will ever get to even seeing one is if he flew to Chicago, dropped by Barack Obama’s house, apologized for all the nasty things he’s been saying about him, and then begs to get a glimpse of Obama’s NPP.

I’d pay good money to see an AI version of that laugher!

There’s no doubt about this one, folks. Homeboy Trump is being royally and undeniably played in front of the whole world by Putin. And it’s a comeuppance of his own making!

But hey, at least we’re not talking about Jeffrey Epstein, are we?

-30-