Tuesday, April 8, 2025

THE CASH COMMENTARY FOR APRIL 10, 2025

 

                                                                      CASH MICHAELS

WARNING: THE COST OF READING THIS 

COMMENTARY JUST WENT UP!

                by Cash Michaels


That’s right! Please be advised that the cost for you to indulge in the unadulterated intellect, and superior wisdom of this weekly commentary has just increased, like almost everything else in this country lately!

Oh, think all you have to do is just stop reading this in order to get around the intellectual tariff that has been imposed? Doesn't change a thing, because thanks to your madman president, there is really no escaping the worldwide damage he has wrought by threatening crazy new tariffs on top of existing ones on imports from all other countries.

        Normally, our American companies import goods from foreign nations to sell to us. Our government then charges those nations a tax or "tariff" on those goods to enter this country, revenue that goes to our U.S. Treasury. It's usually around 1 to 2 %. American companies will either routinely absorb that 1 or 2% tax in their purchases, or pass it on to their customers. 

        But Trump has said he wants to raise those tariffs on what other countries pay at least an additional 10% across the board, to put more money in our U.S. Treasury General Fund. By doing so, he's forcing those countries to make trade deals that either favor us, give us cheaper access to their markets, or bring their manufacturing to our shores, with presumably a lot of investment and jobs as well.

        To confuse matters now, however, Trump has delayed "reciprocal" tariffs for ninety days for everybody except China, who, in Trump's words, refuses to "kiss my ass" like he's forcing every other country to do. 

To Trump, starting an all-out trade war with national friends and foes alike, then have them crawl to him on their bellies begging for a deal, is an ideal situation because it makes him feel in control, with somebody else ultimately paying the price…us!

To some folks (but not too many), that sounds like pretty good economic policy.

To nations like Canada, Mexico and especially China however, it sounds more like bad economic blackmail at the point of a gun, and they don’t like who's finger is on the trigger. China, the world's second largest economy, has made that clear, as the cost of all goods manufactured there and sold here will soon jump dramatically as Trump has hit China with a whopping 125% tariff on goods imported from there. 

        China has returned fire with an 84% duty so far, on USA stuff sold there. Trump thinks he's cowered China into ultimately making a deal. That remains to be seen.

        Fueling that standoff is our trade deficit with China. In 2024, the U.S. exported $143.5 billion in goods to China, compared to China selling us an estimated $438.9 billion in goods.

        That trade surplus is a big thorn in Trump's rump (He's lying when he says the trade deficit is a trillion dollars. The Chinese government doesn't like liars).

        Add to this the fact that China holds approximately $774 billion in U.S. Treasury bonds, or $774 billion in U.S. government debt, the second largest of any foreign country (Japan holds about $1.1 trillion). China uses the U.S. dollars it makes from the trade surplus to reinvest into purchasing more U.S. debt through Treasury bonds.

        In order to keep our interest rates for Treasury bonds low, we allow other countries to buy portions of our federal debt. So do the math - we're already into China for big bucks. If China ever decided to do a massive selloff of the $774 billion in U.S. debt it holds, it could send our interest rates through the roof, and hurt our economic growth. 

        Indeed, Trump fan boy Charlie Gasparino with Fox Business, reluctantly reported Wednesday that our U.S. debt vulnerability is the real reason why Trump was forced to turn tail for 90-days on his worldwide tariff threat.

From what I understand — and I’m getting this from people that are talking to the White House — what happened in the bond market overnight, the spike in yields on the 30-year and the 10-year bond, showed that people were dumping our bonds,” Gasparino said. “And who are those people dumping our bonds? Japan, the biggest holder of bonds, was selling bonds. That’s what I’m getting from some very big money managers. China, maybe to some extent, but it was largely Japan and others.”

“If you have a mass sale of bonds,” Gasparino continued, “… that means people are losing confidence in the US economy, on the ability to do deals with us; and from what I understand, this is what forced the hand of this 90-day reprieve.” 

        CNN and NBC News have also confirmed bond market volatility threatening the US economy was the real reason for Trump's about-face. So China, Japan and others are trying to grab Trump by the throat AND the short hairs, it would seem!

        The Associated Press confirmed Thursday morning that China, vowing to fight Trump and his high tariffs "to the end, " "...is reaching out to other nations...in what attempts to be an attempt to form a united front to compel Washington to retreat."

        China doesn't want to talk, is insulted, and says it doesn't want to deal, despite Trump's slick assurances that it does. If Trump "...truly wants dialogue," he should "immediately rectify [his] wrong practices and adopt the right attitude of equality, respect and mutual benefit," The AP reported a Chinese Foreign Ministry official as saying Thursday.

        Again from The AP Thursday, that Chinese Foreign Ministry official added, "We must solemnly tell the U.S., a tariff-wielding barbarian who attempts to force countries to call and beg for mercy can never expect that call from China."

        Which makes what Trump’s chief guard dog, J. D. Vance, earlier said, not helpful: “We borrow money from Chinese peasants to buy the things those Chinese peasants manufacture.”

        Boy...and people complain that I cuss and use name calling too much!

So now, anything made or grown in China that we buy is affected, but Trump's 125% tariff is in full effect unless China makes a deal. Stuff you never dreamed had anything to do with China, will now get hiked in price, thanks to Trump’s dumb ego trippin'.

        Even though Madman Trump has delayed his worldwide tariff war for ninety days, the damage has already been done. The stock market index has tanked thousands of points over the past week, with investors, large and small, losing trillions of dollars like Niagara Falls. 

      When Trump announced his 90-day pause on tariffs, the markets did bounce back impressively, but it's the uncertainty of this egomaniac's next move that still has the world on edge.

       And Trump's manic economic shell game, and its inherent uncertainty, is by no means welcomed by anyone with any sense.

        "If...we launch economic nuclear war on every country in the world, business investment will grind to a halt, consumers will close their wallets and pocketbooks, and we will severely damage our reputation with the rest of the world that will take years and potentially decades to rehabilitate," predicts hedge fund billionaire Bill Ackman, an actual Trump supporter.

        And Ackman isn't the only richie-rich guy expressing similar gloomy outlooks on the impact of Trump's trade war.

A little history lesson here.

According to VOA (Voice of America) News (which still has its website up, even though Trump dismantled its parent agency): The early 20th century had seen the U.S. make massive economic strides. But when the Great Depression began in 1929, the Republican-dominated Congress sought to help hard-hit American farmers by using tariffs on imported goods to shield them from foreign competition.

Economists and business leaders opposed the idea, pointing out that the U.S. was already running a trade surplus, exporting more than it imported. Nevertheless, the bill was signed into law by President Herbert Hoover in 1930, taxing nearly 2,000 categories of imports at rates upward of 50% – some of the highest in U.S. history.

The bill’s passage drew an immediate outcry from America’s largest trading partners, with 10 of them passing retaliatory measures. France imposed heavy charges on American-made automobiles and Canada increased tariffs on many American imports while lowering them for British goods. Countries like Italy and Switzerland also saw calls for boycotting American products altogether.

As the retaliatory measures combined with the ongoing impact of the Great Depression, over the next few years U.S. exports decreased by 66%.

The tariffs were eventually repealed in 1934 by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who replaced them with bilateral agreements negotiated directly with individual countries.

In 2018, Trump first got into his tariff tizzy with China, and didn’t learn his lesson then. Now, he’s back at it, not giving a tinker’s damn about history.

You now know more than he does about the history of tariffs just reading this commentary. He insists that we should have stuck to our high tariff guns back in the 1930's, no matter what the pain.

        Fortunately, other folks with common sense, brains and hearts know better.

Even Republicans like senators Thom Tillis (NC), Mitch McConnell (KY.), Ted Cruz (TX.) and others have dared to question the wisdom of such a dumb Trump move. Trump’s billionaire buddy, Elon Musk, expressed dismay as well, calling Trump's chief trade and tariff strategist, Peter Navarro, "a moron" and "dumber than a sack of bricks!"

But leave it to VP Vance to once again ride to the rhetorical “rescue.”

Vance is now on record telling “paycheck-to-paycheck Americans” to “suck it up” when it comes to any economic pain we will experience from his boss’s nonsense.

Appearing on Fox and Friends recently, Vance began his bearded-face bullpucky by saying “…[W]e know a lot of Americans are worried. So we are fighting very hard to bring prices down. We’re going to have the biggest deregulation in the history of this country.” 

“What I’d ask folks to appreciate here is that we are not going to fix things overnight,” Vance continued. “…if we pursue the right deregulation, we pursue those energy costs, reducing policies, yes, people are going to see it in their pocketbook.”

“So yeah, we’re going to cut your taxes. You’re going to have more money in your pocket, and that’s of course going to help you deal with the cost of inflation.”

And Vance said all of this with a straight face too!

But let’s break it down. According to Vance, he confirmed that we should expect prices to continue to go up once higher tariffs truly commence, because what Trump is doing will, indeed, cause more inflation. But don’t worry, the v.p. assures, because the Trump Administration will try mightily to soften the blow.

Meanwhile White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told Newsnation the same morning J.D. Vance was trying out his bulletpoint b.s. over on Fox and Friends, that for Americans, there will be no economic blow to soften.

“There’s not going to be any pain for American-owned companies and American workers, because their jobs are going to come back home, and again, as for prices, President Trump is working on tax cuts to put more money back into the pockets of Americans,” Leavitt said, adding Trump’s tariffs are a “golden rule for the golden age”and that Americans can expect price stability, provided they buy American.

“It’s a patriotic thing to do, and, most importantly, they can expect their wages to go up,” she concluded.

         Boy, this woman could reassure a chopped chicken headed for the KFC fryer.

Then we have Trump’s Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick telling CBS’ Face the Nation that U.S. workers, in fact, will not get their lost manufacturing jobs back as promised by Trump’s tariff strategy because new factories built here by foreign investors will likely be automated, run by robots, meaning ultimately American workers won’t be needed.

This kind of triple-double talk about the same subject makes you wonder whether

 Lutnick, Leavitt and Vance even know each other exist, let alone work for the same White House.

And, of course, there’s the madman-in-chief himself, when questioned by a reporter the morning after the markets first crashed like a ten pound bag of pretzels.

I think it’s going very well," Trump said. “It was an operation like when a patient gets operated on and it’s a big thing. The markets are going to boom. The stock is going to boom. The country is going to boom.

That was Trump’s answer, folks.

North Carolina farmers and I have one thing in common. We all know bullcrap when we see and hear it. 

That goes for horsecrap and cowcrap too!

This whole Trump tariffs "boom" thing is economic policy for chumps!

This country is headed towards an economic rabbit hole it may take generations to climb out of if Madman Trump keeps playing games like this. True, the United States is one of the largest markets in the world, and everybody wants a piece of it, and should treat us fairly in that transaction. Even I agree with that logic.

But there’s a cogent reason president after president, except Trump, has steered cleared of getting into a worldwide tariff/trade pissing contest since the 1930s. 

History has shown that they just don’t work.

Trump admits that he’s doing all of this to dominate other countries, especially China, which actually means he’s trying to dominate the world.

That’s why we’re hearing such idiotic nonsense about turning Canada into a 51st state, or owning Greenland, or changing the Gulf of Mexico into the Gulf of America.

And what Trump doesn’t finish, he’ll leave either to J.D. Vance, or his crazy son Don Jr., to complete down the road.

It’s a crazy master plan to bring this country down to its legal and economic knees so he can use the spoils to rebuild it into a customized world power where he is the master authority. The man is even planning a $92 million military parade in Washington to celebrate his 79th birthday. 

        How crazy is that?

Don’t say you weren’t warned. All of you MAGA suckers thought that Trump was working for you. Well, your prices and costs of living are about to skyrocket too, and all of this bull about Trump making you wealthy is blinding you to reality.

        Can you spell R-E-C-E-S-S-I-O-N, boys and girls?

        This is the end of America as we know it, folks. And it will take more than courageous Democrats like Sen. Cory Booker delivering a 25-hour speech, or millions of people participating in protest marches across the country on a Saturday afternoon, to save us.

Much more.

The question is…are each one of us willing to pay the high price for freedom in the face of such home grown insanity and tyranny?

Like I tried to warn you…the cost of reading this commentary just went up, not in dollars and cents, but in the kind of courage needed to make a difference in saving this nation from madness and destruction.

The question again is…can you afford to ignore it?

                                                        -30-



Sunday, April 6, 2025

THE CASH STUFF FOR APRIL 10, 2025

                                            Jefferson Griffin IN CONFEDERATE UNIFORM
                                    JUSTICE ALLISON RIGGS    JUDGE JEFFERSON GRIFFIN

NC SUPREME COURT STEPS 

INTO RIGGS-GRIFFIN ELECTION

VOTE CONTROVERSY

By Cash Michaels

Contributing writer


The only unresolved election contest in the country, five months after the November 2024 balloting, is here in North Carolina, and it’s aftermath has taken another significant turn. 

          On Monday, the NC Supreme Court stepped in to temporarily stop an order by a three-judge panel of the NC Court of Appeals that would have compelled over 60,000 North Carolina voters, many of whom are Black, prove their eligibility in the race between incumbent state Supreme Justice Allison Riggs, a Democrat, and NC Appellate Court Judge Jefferson Griffin, a Republican.

The race between Riggs and Griffin was for Justice Riggs’ state Supreme Court seat. After a post-election statewide recount last November, Justice Riggs reportedly won her race by 734 votes out of 5.2 million cast over Judge Griffin. But refusing to accept defeat, Griffin contested Riggs’ victory by challenging over 60,000 votes already counted, alleging that those voters were not eligible to cast ballots because their registrations were invalid with incomplete Social Security or driver’s license numbers.

Both the NC Board of Elections and a Trump-appointed federal judge had already ruled that that information was no longer necessary for valid voter registrations, but that didn’t stop Judge Griffin from pressing his case legally to work his way up to courts that might rule more in his favor.

Judge Griffin is hoping that by eliminating those 60,000 plus votes, he will effectively win the race for the NC Supreme Court, taking Justice Riggs’ seat. 

Riggs is one of only two Democrats on the seven-member high court. Her loss would make it difficult for Democrats to regain the majority anytime in the near future.

A three-judge panel of the NC Appellate Court ruled in Griffin’s favor last Friday with a 2-1 decision, with the panel’s two Republican judges - colleagues of Judge Griffin - ruling in his favor.

That panel gave the over 60,000 voters in question 15 days to prove their eligibility or have their votes in the Riggs-Griffin contest thrown out, but the state Supreme Court stepped in Monday to temporarily block the order.

If Judge Griffin is successful in having those over 60,000 votes thrown out, experts say it would be unprecedented in U.S. electoral history. The votes of over 60,000 otherwise qualified voters would be discounted through no fault of their own. By every metric, they followed the rules and qualified, and yet, their votes could be disqualified after they have been cast.

        Griffin was able to successfully mount his legal challenges because he acted before Justice Riggs' 734 recount vote victory could be certified by the state Board of Elections.

       According to election experts, other races those 60,000+ voters participated in aren't affected because they have been legally settled, certified, and the winners have taken office, so there is no going back regardless of the result of the Riggs-Griffin race, which has not been certified.

        And there's another unsettling fact.

According to a January analysis of the challenged 60,000+ votes by the Raleigh News and Observer, “…Black registered voters were twice as likely to have their votes challenged as white voters. Voters aged 18 to 25 were the largest age group among the challenged voters, accounting for about 23% of all protests, despite making up about 12% of the electorate. And while Democrats and unaffiliated voters made up the majority of the challenged voters, the analysis found, about 22% of the challenged ballots were cast by registered Republicans.

In that same January N&O story, the Raleigh paper added, “ When comparing the challenged voters to the total registered voters of both racial groups, Black voters were twice as likely to have their ballots contested. That difference largely persists regardless of voters’ party affiliation. Many of the challenged voters — about 38% — did not have a race designated on their voter registration. Chris Cooper, a political scientist at Western Carolina University, said this is likely part of a growing trend of voters not filling out optional demographic categories when they register to vote. Bob Hall, a longtime North Carolina government watchdog, noted that the state has been found to have enacted legislation that targeted Black voters in the past. He pointed to the 2016 ruling from the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals which found that North Carolina’s old voter ID law targeted Black voters with “surgical precision.” “Over and over again, in these cases where Republican operatives and candidates and legislators are taking action to get more power — they’re doing it at the expense of Black voters,” Hall said.

The NC GOP charged that the Democrat-majority state Board of Elections is actually responsible for the controversy by counting votes that should have been thrown out. 

“The integrity of the ballot box is the cornerstone of our democracy. Jefferson Griffin’s commitment to this process demonstrates his dedication to upholding the rule of law and protecting the voices of lawful voters,” said State Republican Party Chair Jason Simmons. 

The Democratic Party has sued Judge Griffin and the state Republican Party, charging that they are trying to overturn a legally settled election.  

On top of this week’s developments, the Associated Press recently reported that Judge Jefferson Griffin was photographed posing in a Confederate soldier’s uniform in front of a Confederate battle flag while a student at UNC- Chapel Hill years ago.

Judge Griffin acknowledged the old Kappa Alpha fraternity photo when it was recently published.

"I attended a college fraternity event that, in hindsight, was inappropriate and does not reflect the person I am today," Griffin said in a statement. "At that time, like many college students, I did not fully grasp such participation's broader historical and social implications. Since then, I have grown, learned, and dedicated myself to values that promote unity, inclusivity, and respect for all people."

Kappa Alpha fraternity was reportedly well known many years ago to be a “lightning rod …for the racist and insensitive actions of some of its members,” published reports say.

-30-

 DRAMA AT ST. AUG’S

CONTINUES AS SCHOOL

SUED FOR OVER $18 MIL

By Cash Michaels

Contributing writer


A month after losing its academic accreditation, the drama at St. Augustine’s University (SAU) continues.

The small, private HBCU in Raleigh is now being sued by two tech companies for over $18 million for reportedly failing to pay for contracted services. That’s $18 million in addition to at least $7 million owed the federal government in back taxes, millions more in fees owed to assorted vendors, and probable millions more in pending lawsuits from former employees if the school loses in litigation.

SAU officials did indicate that the school had secured a $70 million land lease loan with a Florida developer, but that deal ran into trouble with the state attorney general’s office, which was required to approve the terms because SAU is a nonprofit institution. Not much has been revealed since about the status of that deal.

To add to the SAU drama, the embattled school is preparing to graduate the Class of 2025 next month, thanks to a temporary appeals accreditation period it has while fighting the March decision by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (SACSCOC).

But after its upcoming May commencement, not much is known about just how long SAU can, or will remain open for another school year. Last August, SAU had an enrollment of only 200 students, down considerably from a normal enrollment in years prior of at least 1,600 students per semester.

Filed a week apart, the two recent lawsuits accuse SAU of failure to pay for services rendered by two companies.

One company, SBA Connect, claims that SAU went into default on its agreement to provide wireless service last September 2024. One of SBA Connect’s options to settle its outstanding debt is for SAU to pay $16, 860, 597.50 plus interest.

The second company to file litigation against SAU, Avaria, maintains that the school has paid some of the debt it owes the IT firm. According to Avaria’s lawsuit, SAU still owes $448, 067 in overdue bills since 2020, and $884,520 for the balance of its contract.

Reportedly, Avaria is still providing IT services to SAU, despite the litigation.

-30-


ONGOING WAR AGAINST DEI

CONTINUES AS BERGER FILES

BILL BANNING IT AT NC COLLEGES

By CashMichaels

Contributing writer


Powerful Republican Senate Majority leader Phil Berger has now added his legislation to the growing opposition to DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) policies and practices. And if his bill passes, not only is DEI outlawed on public college campuses, but racial and gender bias complaints would also be prohibited.

On March 26th, Sen. Berger (R-Rockingham) filed Senate Bill 558, titled “Eliminating  “DEI” in Public Higher Education.” 

“An act to demonstrate the General Assembly’s intent that students, professors, administrators, and other employees of public institutions of higher education recognize the equality and rights of all persons and to prohibit public institutions of higher education from promoting certain concepts that are contrary to the intent,” SB 558’s description reads.

         DEI was once used by colleges and companies in the aftermath of the 2020 police murder of George Floyd as a way to ensure that qualified Blacks and other people of color were given equal opportunity to compete for educational and employment opportunities. However in May 2024, the conservative majority of U.S. Supreme Court deemed the practice unconstitutional in higher education.

Republicans in North Carolina have since labeled DEI a “divisive concept.” A bill pending in the state House even makes it a criminal offensive for public money to be used to promote DEI policies and practices. 

The Rockingham County Republican makes clear in SB 558’s language that it was inspired by Pres. Donald Trump’s January 21st, 2025 executive order banning DEI “…to ensure that higher education recipients of federal funds comply with all applicable laws prohibiting illegal discrimination and comply with the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard …”

Because in the last fiscal year, North Carolina’s public colleges and universities received $2.4 billion in federal aid, and it’s therefore the NC General Assembly’s job to “protect the practice of higher education…,” SB 558 mandates that the UNC Board of Governors adopt a policy not only banning DEI policies and practices, but also “…prohibiting (public colleges) from establishing, maintaining or otherwise implementing a group or committee designed to investigate a bias incident.”

Bias incident in the bill is defined as “…any conduct, speech, or expression…” that the college, group or committee labels as “…intimidating, demeaning, mocking, degrading, or marginalizing an individual or group based on the perceived or actual identity of that individual or group.”

Each public college or university will be required to certify annually in writing by September 1st to the UNC Board of Governors that they are in compliance with the law, if passed.

SB 558’s language adds, “ For the certification due September 1, 2025, …..each public institution of higher education shall also include information on the initial implementation of this act, including reductions in force and spending, changes to jib titles and position descriptions, and how savings achieved from these actions have been directed.”

        Critics of the measure warn that as written, SB 558 is overly broad and does not really define DEI. Those critics add that the bill would chill free and open discussion on North Carolina college campuses.

The bill becomes law upon passage.

-30-