BEASLEY VS. BUDD:
NC’S BIG SENATE RACE
BEGINS
By Cash Michaels
An analysis
As expected in the aftermath of last week’s big primary contests, former NC Supreme Court Chief Justice Cheri Beasley, a Democrat, and U.S. Congressman Ted Budd, a Trump-endorsed Republican, came out of their respective party’s races victorious, and will face each other in the November 8 midterm general election for the U.S. Senate.
The Beasley-Budd showdown is one of the most closely watched Senate races in the country, and could decide the balance of power in an evenly split US Senate.
Both are competing to succeed outgoing Republican three-term incumbent Sen. Richard Burr.
Between now and November, observers say watch how Beasley and Budd will try to define each other, and themselves, to attract the largest number of undecided voters in the state. That’s key, because assuming that Democrats and Republicans have good turnouts respectively, unaffiliated voters will tip the scale and make the difference in a close contest.
All Cheri Beasley has to do is get a maximum turnout of Democrats, as many Republicans as she can convince to vote for her (effectively taking them from Ted Budd), and a majority of the undecided. Thus far, she has been trying to define herself in the minds of voters before Ted Budd does it, as a middle-of-the-road moderate Democrat who supports a woman’s right to choose, working families and law and order.
A Republican group supporting Budd, on the other hand, tried to define Beasley in campaign ads four days before primary night, as a former justice who was soft on hard criminals, and can’t be trusted to fight crime. Beasley has countered this strategy by denying the charge, explaining that she has followed established law in every legal opinion.
And while Beasley should, when practical, defend her record, that’s what she must be careful not to spend too much time doing, political observers say..
The Budd campaign might employ the old Jesse Helms tactic of forcing an opponent to spend more time and resources defending themselves, than attacking and defining the attacker. So if Budd claims that Beasley is soft on crime, he forces Beasley to expend energy on defending that, while Budd then pulls out other charges, forcing Beasley to be on the defense 24/7.
If Budd is to be successfully attacked, the Democratic Party and other outside groups will have to do it for Beasley.
The Beasley campaign may also want to study how Bud won his Republican primary. His closest rival for the GOP nomination was former NC Gov. Pat McCrory.
McCrory, a former mayor of Charlotte, had prided himself on being a well-liked moderate, but saw the need to move further to the right politically in the primary in order to attract more Trump supporters. But in a visit to the state last June, the former president shocked McCrory, then the Republican frontrunner, by endorsing the least known GOP Senate candidate at the time, Budd.
It didn’t help that the Budd campaign defined the former Republican governor as catering to “liberal” Democrats while in office.
Budd, a conservative congressman elected in 2017 to the 13th Congressional District and a gun shop owner from Advance, continued to hammer McCrory, all the while staying out of public debates as to not allow the field of 14 primary opponents a chance to challenge or define him.
Budd stayed on the attack to win. Now that he’s up against a distinguished former chief justice of the NC Supreme Court who is also a Black woman. Cheri Beasley’s other strength is that she has raised more money for her campaign than any other Senate candidate of either party this year.
And she proved that she can run in a statewide race when she fell only 401 votes shy out of over 4 million cast last November, losing her seat on the NC Supreme Court.
But running for the state’s highest judicial position, and running for a U.S. Senate seat, are two different things.
Beasley already has the support of urban voters across the state. She must be able to convince the rural voters of North Carolina that she also shares their values if she’s to defeat Ted Budd.
In short, Cheri Beasley will not win North Carolina’s U.S. Senate seat by just the Black vote alone, though that is important.
She must make inroads into Ted Budd’s white conservative territory, in order to become North Carolina’s first African-American U.S. senator.
To beat Beasley, Budd must hope that rural Republicans and GOP leaning independents turnout just as strong as they did in November 2020.
-30-
REV. DR. T. ANTHONY SPEARMAN
EXCLUSIVE
FORMER NC NAACP PRES.
SUSPENDED; VOWS TO SUE
By Cash Michaels
Contributing writer
There’s a new chapter in the ongoing saga of the controversial NC NAACP executive committee elections from October of 2021 where incumbent President Rev. Dr. T Anthony Spearman was ousted from office by New Hanover County NAACP Pres. Deborah Dicks Maxwell.
Rev. Spearman says he’s in the process of filing suit against the national NAACP because it apparently has suspended him from membership. As reported exclusively before, Rev. Spearman is part of a North Carolina group now called “NAACP Justice Coalition” led by Rev. Dr. Cardes Brown of Greensboro, that filed an Article 10 complaint about alleged election violations that occurred last October.
The group maintained that these alleged election improprieties violated the NAACP Constitution and Bylaws, and should invalidate all new NC NAACP officers elected.
Derrick Johnson, NAACP president/CEO, however, dismissed the Article 10 complaint from Spearman and the coalition in December, saying it “lack of merit.”
Weeks later, Dr. Spearman says he was informed that he had been suspended in a letter dated February 7, 2022 from national NAACP Pres./CEO Derrick Johnson. Someone gave him a copy of the letter that allegedly had been sent out, but not to him, due to his not receiving it.
A copy of the letter reviewed by this reporter notes that it was sent “Via Regular Mail and Email,” not by standard certified mail important business documents are normally sent by, to Rev. Spearman at a Greensboro address, followed by “Re: Suspension Letter.”
From there the NAACP letter from Johnson alleges in detail that Spearman, “ ..despite repeated requests from President Maxwell and the NAACP Office of the General Counsel, you have failed to return the state Conference’s property.”
The NAACP letter goes on to quote from the NAACP Bylaws the requirements for members to return property of the branch within 30 days after an election. The missive also warns Spearman that “…continued recalcitrant conduct will cause irreparable harm to the Association and the State Conference. Specifically, your failure to comply is disrupting the orderly transition in leadership and interfering with the State Conference’s ability to conduct its business affairs. Moreover, this ongoing dispute is tarnishing the reputation of the Association and has made it difficult for the State Conference to represent the interests of our members.”
Later in the NAACP letter from Pres./CEO Johnson, it says, “ In light of the potential adverse impact on the State Conference, your continued membership in the Association presents a danger of harm to the NAACP and the State Conference. Accordingly, action is necessary to prevent or mitigate that harm. Accordingly, I hereby suspend your membership in the Association, effective immediately, pending investigation and a full hearing (if you so request) regarding the allegations contained
in this letter.
Ironically, Johnson writes that Rev. Spearman is entitled to a hearing if requested in writing that “…must be sent by certified mail.”
“You are directed to cease and desist immediately from holding yourself out as a member of the NAACP and as the State Conference President.,” Johnson concludes.
Pres. Johnson’s letter to Spearman is copied to the chair of the National NAACP Board of Directors, and Deborah Maxwell, NC NAACP president.
In his lawsuit, Rev. Spearman will undoubtedly note that the National NAACP Constitution and Bylaws maintain that where there is an election dispute, all previous officers are to stay in place until a resolution has been reached, and he was in his rights to hold onto the property of his office as state conference president until resolution of the complaint had been satisfactorily reached.
The NAACP Justice Coalition says resolution was not reached, despite Derrick Johnson saying that it’s Article 10 complaint was without merit.
Sources also tell this reporter that at a national NAACP meeting last weekend, all members of the NAACP Justice Coalition had been suspended. Rev. Dr. Brown confirmed that as of Monday, none had received letters of confirmation.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment