Monday, April 15, 2024

THE CASH STUFF FOR APRIL 18, 2024

 

JOSH STEIN


                                                                      RONNIE LONG


WRONGFULLY CONVICTED

MAN CHALLENGES STEIN

ON ACTIONS DURING 

INCARCERATION

By Cash Michaels

Contributing writer


A wrongfully convicted man has openly challenged state Attorney General Josh Stein for saying on a recent radio program that he doesn’t regret how his office handled the case.

Ronnie Long, 68, served 44 years of an 80-year prison sentence after being wrongfully convicted of raping a 54-year-old white woman in 1976. He maintained his innocence throughout.

Long was just 20 years-old and living in Concord when he was arrested and charged with the crime, and then convicted by an all-white jury.

During the course of his incarceration, Long’s attorneys filed numerous appeals of his conviction. During those years, it was determined that Long’s jury had been tampered with, and investigators with the Concord Police Dept. lied on the witness stand. In addition, it was determined that prosecutors withheld exculpatory evidence from Long’s defense.

Meanwhile, while Long was in prison, his parents had died. He was not allowed to attend their funerals.

Still, in March 2020, neither Atty. Gen. Stein’s office nor a panel of the U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals were moved to undo the injustice done to Long. 

"We're paying taxes in North Carolina to keep an innocent man in prison while a guilty man has been free to harm more people for 44 years," Ashleigh Long, Ronnie’s wife, said then. "He was a tri-athlete, could've gone pro for baseball. All these opportunities were taken for him and for what? Because he's a black man in North Carolina? People don't want to hear it but it's the truth."

The Duke North Carolina Innocence Commission had taken up Long’s case in 2015, and discovered much of the new evidence pointing to Long’s innocence.

Those attorneys, using the new evidence, appealed to the full federal appellate court.

Atty. Gen Stein’s office argued, however, for the court to uphold Long’s conviction. "There was a jury that convicted him, his conviction has been upheld a number of times," Stein told ABC11 in Durham. "The panel that just heard the case upheld the conviction. The case right now is before the full 4th circuit and we'll see what they do."

Stein then added, "That is exactly what our job is - to uphold convictions, and all the time, defendants will say there was a problem with the trial. And that's ultimately what the courts determine. Was there a problem and should there be a new trial? That is exactly what is before the 4th circuit."

But a day later, Stein backtracked, posting a tweet saying, “I misspoke. My job is to seek justice. That’s what we  try to do every day at the department of justice."

Finally, the full U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ordered a lower court to reopen Long’s case. By this time, the Cabarrus County District Attorney’s Office had determined that it would not seek a new trial.

In 2020, Gov. Roy Cooper finally granted Ronnie Long a pardon of innocence.

After Long’s conviction was vacated and he was released from prison on August 27, 2020, he was told he would receive $750,000 in compensation paid out at $50,000 a year, the maximum amount possible under North Carolina law. 

Long fought the law, charging that it was grossly unfair given how he was treated by the state.

In January 2024, Long received a $22 million settlement from the city of Concord, and a $3 million settlement from the State Bureau of Investigation. combined the second largest wrongful conviction settlement ever recorded. 

Last week, Long wrote an op-ed published in the Raleigh News and Observer titled, “I was wrongfully convicted. AG Josh Stein is refusing to do the right thing.”

“Stein recently appeared on a national radio show and was asked about his office’s conduct in my case. While I was wrongfully imprisoned, the attorney general’s office went to great lengths to keep me there despite the lies and deceit by law enforcement officers and prosecutors that led to my conviction. As described by Judge James Wynn of the U.S. Court of Appeals, in his separate opinion in my case, “...the State has maintained (my) guilt — even while concealing evidence showing otherwise.”

Long’s op-ed continued, “When that evidence was finally disclosed, the attorney general’s office undertook a misinformation campaign to excuse the state’s conduct rather than acknowledge it. This campaign included arguments that the officers did not lie, but were simply mistaken, that the concealed evidence was irrelevant to my conviction, and that I knew of the evidence all along. The A.G.’s Office advanced these arguments because it could, not because there was any support for them.”

“Despite all this, when radio host Clay Cane asked Stein whether he had any regrets about how his office handled my case, he firmly replied, “I don’t, I don’t.” In explaining his office’s actions, Stein said that there are cases “where people look at the facts and come to different conclusions.” That is true, but it should be deeply disturbing to the citizens of North Carolina that, in this of all cases, Stein doubled down on the actions of his office that unnecessarily caused me, an innocent man, to languish in prison. Worse, the actual perpetrator of the sexual assault I was convicted of was never brought to justice. Does Stein regret that his office aggressively defended my wrongful conviction while the true assailant remained free? Does he regret that the victim died believing a lie told to her by the corrupt police officers that his office defended?”

This newspaper put the two questions Long asked to the AG Stein’s office on Monday, giving him until 5 p.m. Friday to answer.

This newspaper plans a followup story next week, based on AG Stein’s office’s answers or non-answers.

Mr. Stein is the Democratic candidate for governor in November. It is only fair to ask questions of his record as state attorney general, and give him or his office the proper opportunity to respond to Ronnie Long’s questions.

            -30-


                                                                     O.J. SIMPSON
                                        U.S. DEFENSE SECRETARY LLOYD AUSTIN

BLACK MEN AND PROSTATE

CANCER: OJ’S DEATH REMINDS

US TO SEEK HELP EARLY

By Cash Michaels

Contributing writer

Last week, the world was taken aback by news that former football great O.J. Simpson had died of prostate cancer at age 76.

In January, eyeopening news that Dexter Scott King, one of late civil rights leader Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s children, also died of prostate cancer at age 62.

And in March, acclaimed Academy Award winning actor Louis Gossett, Jr., age 87, also died. While cause of death wasn’t officially given, Gossett himself revealed that he was battling prostate cancer many years ago at age 73.

The litany of famous Black men who have been diagnosed with prostate cancer is noteworthy - retired Gen Colin Powell, actor Sidney Poitier, singer/activist Harry Belafonte, “Today Show” weatherman Al Roker  and U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin are among the many.

Gen. Powell, Poitier and Belafonte eventually died due to other causes, but they all encountered the deadly disease in the later years of their lives.

Shining the light on these great figures of Black history illustrates the point that Black men are more than 1.6 times more likely to develop prostate cancer, and aggressive forms of prostate cancer, than any other racial group of males, according to the Prostate Cancer Foundation.

Black men are twice as likely to die from prostate cancer too.

What causes prostate cancer? Researchers don’t know, and they don’t know why Black men are more prone to contract it than others. But what they do know is early detection key to treating it effectively, and ultimately curing it.

However, once prostate cancer reaches stage four, there is no known cure. Life is prolonged only through treatment.

What is prostate cancer, and why don’t women contract it?

The prostate is a small gland in the male reproductive system that sits below the bladder. It helps to produce hormones and semen, in addition to regulating urine flow.

The reason why early detection of prostate cancer is so important, doctors say, is because there are no symptoms for many years. Thus, having regular screenings by a health provider to detect it is important.

When prostate cancer does reach critical levels, patients may experience unintentional weight loss; a weak urine stream; pain in the back, hips and thighs; painful ejaculation or a decrease on the amount of ejaculate; blood in the semen or urine.

According to the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, all males, particularly Black males, under the age of 45, should have a PSA ( prostate-specific antigen) screening from their doctor annually, as well as regular prostate exams.

If prostate cancer runs in your family history, tell your doctor.

Treatments for prostate cancer include (depending on what stage it is detected) having the prostate surgically removed; having chemotherapy or radiation to kill the cancer cells; hormone therapy to suppress testosterone to lower the growth of prostate cancer.

Of special note is if the prostate cancer cells remain in the prostate, a patient’s survival rate is also 100% with treatment.

But if prostate cancer cells have spread throughout the body, particularly the bones, survival rate is generally 30%.

At the most, a patient can hope to survive maybe five-years at the stage, which is rare.

U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, who was severely criticized for not making his prostate cancer treatments public recently when he went missing for several days, said, “I did not handle this right. I should have told the president about my cancer diagnosis. I should have also told my team and the American public, and I take full responsibility.” 

“I’m here with a clear message to other men, especially older men, “Sec. Austin continued. “Get screened. Get your regular checkups.”

-30-




Sunday, April 7, 2024

THE CASH STUFF FOR APRIL11, 2024

BLACK LAWSUIT OVER SENATE

REDISTRICTING GOES TO TRIAL

IN DECEMBER AFTER ELECTIONS

By Cash Michaels

Contributing writer


After having motions for preliminary injunctions rejected by both a federal district court judge and the U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, a lawsuit brought by two African-American plaintiffs challenging two state Senate districts redrawn by the Republican-led NC General Assembly, may go to trial at the earliest this December 2.

But Republican legislative leaders say that date is too soon.

The move is significant because the trial will take place after the November general elections, meaning that the two contested Senate voting districts in northeastern North Carolina will be used during balloting, which is what the two Black plaintiffs attempted to stop in the first place.

The second note of concern is that the redistricting plan will be going back before the federal district court judge who initially dismissed plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction on January 26th. That judge, James C. Dever, dismissed the motion saying that it was too close to the March 5th primary for it to be considered without causing disruption.

But Judge Dever also was not impressed with plaintiffs’ argument that the two state Senate Districts, as redrawn by the legislature last October, denied African-American voters their choice of candidates because the districts were drawn in violation of the 1965 Voting Rights Act and split the Black voting population.

That argument also failed to convince a federal three-judge panel of the federal appellate court to grant the petitioned injunction. Having failed to stop the Senate redistricting maps, plaintiffs then decided to move forward with a full trial in federal court.

Republican legislative leaders stated in court papers for the defense that they preferred for the trial to be held no earlier than Feb. 3rd, 2025. They made clear to Judge Dever why they felt a December 2nd trial date was too soon.

“Legislative Defendants believe that Plaintiffs’ proposed December 2, 2024, trial date would not provide sufficient time for the parties’ experts to analyze the final election results from the November 2024 elections — the official certified results will not be final until after the Statewide canvass, which is most likely to be held on or about November 26, 2024,” attorneys for the defendants stated.

But plaintiffs countered in their submitted motions that the December 2nd date was more appropriate.

“It is unnecessary and prejudicial to push out the trial date to February 2025 to allow for a second round of full blown expert reports and depositions,” plaintiffs’ attorneys stated. “Given the realities of this litigation, potential appeals, and the need for remedial proceedings, if Plaintiffs are successful, Plaintiffs anticipate that – under the schedule Legislative Defendants propose – Legislative Defendants may eventually argue that there is not enough time to afford relief in advance of 2026 [elections].” 

Even though Republican legislative leaders are allowed to submit court papers on behalf of defendants in the lawsuit, the State Board of Elections is actually listed as the defendants of record. They have made clear that they have “no objection” holding the trial in either December or February.

The trial is expected to last at least five days.

-30- 


REPORT: OVER 10,000 TEACHERS 

LEAVE N.C. CLASSROOMS

By Cash Michaels

Contributing writer


According to a recently released state report, more than 10,000 North Carolina teachers left the classroom in 2023, the highest number for an annual period in the last twenty years. Purportedly, the resignations were mostly from first-year teachers, as well as educators who had just become eligible for full retirement benefits.

That’s 11.5% of North Carolina’s rank-and-file 90,000 teaching force - 1 in 9 - that have left between March 2022 and March 2023, and is at least 42% more than those who left in 2022.

The concerning news was part of the State of the Teaching Profession report presented to the State Board of Education April 3rd.

Officials say the reasons for the massive teacher exits are not specifically clear, though traditionally, low salaries and difficult working conditions are considered the likely causes.

North Carolina is 46th nationally in first-year teacher pay, and 34th out of fifty states in average teacher pay.

Raising teacher pay is one of the issues state Attorney General Josh Stein raised during is candidates interview with the NC Black Publishers’ Association.

It is a disgrace how the General Assembly has defunded public education in the state. North Carolina ranks 49th in the country in the share of our state’s economy that we spend on K-12 education,” Stein, a Democrat, said.

“We don’t pay our teachers enough, there are not enough support personnel in our schools, or school counselors or school nurses.  And we don’t have enough affordable early childhood education slots in North Carolina. We can do better, we must do better.”

Stein’s Republican gubernatorial opponent, Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson, is on record as saying that if elected governor, he would cut money from the state’s education system.

Robinson told the East Wake Republican Club last December “it has already been proven that school systems get better results on less money,” and that “cutting the fat” would be “essential.”

Later on in a newspaper questionnaire, Robinson added, “we also need to ensure teachers are treated as the professionals they are by paying them more and holding them to high standards of excellence.”

There was also a feeling on the part of departing teachers of a lack of support from their school administrations, in addition to an ever increasing workload.

All of this, while a separate report shows that less people are actually joining the profession to become teachers. There is a declining enrollment in teacher preparation programs, with just over 15,860 - a ten percent drop from 2021 to 2023.

In hopes of stemming the significant loss of teaching talent across the state, schools are hoping to lure people from other professions to the classroom. That means those who stay must work towards a N.C. teaching license if they intend to stay on the job longer than three years.

Per the report, approximately 6,000 teaching positions across the state were not filled by a qualified educator at the beginning of the 2023-24 school year. Substitute teachers have been filling the void.

Tom Tomberlin, senior director of the State Department of Public Instruction’s Office of Education Preparation and Teacher Licensure told the state board that despite the eyeopening news, school systems were pushing forward to replenish the teaching ranks.

“The silver lining of this cloud is the extraordinary work that our [school districts] do in finding teachers, specifically the HR directors and their recruitment staffs,” Tomberlin told board members. “It is extraordinary what they do to replenish our supplies every year.”

-30-

Monday, April 1, 2024

THE CASH STUFF FOR APRIL 4, 2024

 

                                       PRES. JOE BIDEN AND VICE PRES. KAMALA HARRIS


WHY IS NORTH CAROLINA KEY

TO A BIDEN-HARRIS VICTORY?

By Cash Michaels

Contributing writer


Vice President Kamala Harris is expected back in North Carolina for the fourth time this year, scheduled to visit Charlotte today to discuss

what the Biden Administration is doing about the climate crisis, environmental justice, and increasing access to capital in underserved communities. 

She visited an elementary school in the Queen City last January, where she then announced new violence prevention measures and an allotment of federal mental health funding for North Carolina schools.

Harris will also open a “new coordinated campaign office” while in Charlotte, the first of ten scheduled to be opened across North Carolina to help re-elect the Biden-Harris ticket, in addition to other down ballot Democratic candidates.

She’ll be joined by Goldsboro native and former NC secretary of the Dept. of Environmental Quality, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Michael S. Regan, the first African-American to serve in that position.

The vice president was also just in Raleigh last week, along with Pres. Joe Biden, where the two talked about healthcare, and fundraised to the tune of $2.3 million. That joint appearance was held at Chavis Park Community Center, in the heart of Southeast Raleigh’s Black community. That appearance was Biden’s second in the state this year.

On March 1st, VP Harris visited Durham’s “Black Wall Street” to discuss Black economic development, entrepreneurship, and supporting Black small businesses. 

Political observers agree multiple visits from the Biden Administration to the state signals that locking down North Carolina as battleground territory - Biden lost here to Republican Donald Trump by 1.4 % during the 2020 election -  for the 2024 presidential rematch election, is a priority for the campaign. And for Democrats, there’s no locking down the Tar Heel State without capturing North Carolina’s important Black vote.

As of October 2022, North Carolina had 7.4 million registered voters. According to the NC Board of Elections, 34% of whom were Democrats. In the 2020 election, 68% of African-American voters, mostly Democrats, turned out.

The Biden-Harris campaign is moving early and aggressively in North Carolina amid reports that nationally, Black men are supporting Trump in greater percentages than ever before.

According to published reports, African-American men are “leaning more conservative than Black women,” with a recent Gallop poll showing Democrats losing their lead with Black voters by 20 points in the past three years. A NY Times/Siena College poll last month showed 23 percent of African-American voters supporting Trump if the election were held today.

Nationally, that’s a troubling 10 % jump from the 13 percent black voter support that the Republican former president received in 2020. VP Harris’ repeated visits to North Carolina are apparently designed to combat reported dissatisfaction in the African-American community with the Biden Administration’s early failures at improving the economy.

Black Republican Trump supporter Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida, reportedly under consideration to become Trump’s vice presidential running mate, recently told The Independent that Black men are drawn to the Republican candidate because “Black men are starting to think through their politics and not just party. His, heart at his core, Trump’s a hustler, man. So it’s hustling and working hard and grinding and trying to just make money and build empires and build that stuff. You know, I don’t think it’s a Black male thing. I think men in general like that and follow that.”

Democrats dismiss the idolatry by Donalds, Sen. Tim Scott, Ben Carson and other Black Republican males of Donald Trump, noting that in the Democratic Party, the most loyal base of supporters are led consistently by African-American women.

Thus, it’s no accident that the first black woman to ever be elected vice President of the United States is the ever visible tip of the re-election spear when it comes to the Biden-Harris campaign.

Flushed with money now, the campaign is also reportedly making big Black media buys, and engaging prominent Black Democratic elected officials to get on the campaign bandwagon early.

In March, the Biden-Harris campaign launched two television ads in the battleground states of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, which will run through April 21st.

With Biden speaking directly to Black voters, one of the ads states:

“As bad as Trump was, his economy was worse, and Black America felt it the most,” Biden said. “He cut health insurance while giving tax breaks to the wealthy and big business. He stoked racial violence, attacked voting rights, and, if reelected, vowed to be a dictator and, quote, get revenge. We can’t go back.”

Supporters of Pres. Biden also note that the Black unemployment rate is now the lowest it’s ever been, certainly lower than it was under Pres. Trump.

With the presidential election now officially seven months away, political observers say expect more from both campaigns targeting the African-American community.

For Donald Trump, his mission is to lure as much Black support away from the Democratic fold as possible in order to win North Carolina. He’s also counting on whatever drawing power Black conservative Republican gubernatorial candidate Mark Robinson may have with rural conservative Black voters to help get the job done.

For Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, their mission is to hold onto whatever Black voter support they have in North Carolina, and build on it if possible, in order to put the Tar Heel State, and it’s vital 15 Electoral College votes, in the winner’s column on November 5th.

-30-


BLACK REDISTRICTING LAWSUIT

FAILS IN FEDERAL APPEALS COURT

By Cash Michaels

Contributing writer


A lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Republican-led NC General Assembly’s latest state Senate voting redistricting map was shot down by a federal three-judge appellate panel of the U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals.

The suit, brought by two African-American plaintiffs, sought to block the voting map from being further used in the 2024 elections, claiming that it diluted black voting strength in the state’s historic northeastern “Black Belt,” across two Senate districts, thus violating the 1965 Voting Rights Act by  not allowing Black voters there to elect their own state senatorial candidates.

The March 28th 97-page opinion issued by the court however, only denied a preliminary injunction against the Senate redistricting map.The merits of the plaintiffs’ claims can still be heard at federal district court trial.

“The denial of preliminary relief is just that: preliminary,” wrote the Republican appellate court panel majority. “It may be that with discovery and further factual development, plaintiffs can prove that these two Senate districts violate Section 2 of the (Voting Rights Act) and they are entitled to a majority-minority district in northeastern North Carolina.” 

But if the two Black plaintiffs intend to take the case to trial, they’ll have to hurry to get it heard before the upcoming November 5h general elections. That may not make a difference, however. The case is being sent back to federal District Court Judge James C. Dever, the original Republican judge who slammed the lawsuit when he dismissed it earlier this year.

“Plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires an extraordinary, mandatory preliminary injunction compelling the race-based sorting of voters for the 2024 Senate elections in North Carolina,” Dever wrote in his earlier opinion.. “On the current record, plaintiffs are not likely to succeed on the merits of their Section 2 claim and are not likely to suffer irreparable harm…”



-30-